Hungarian citizens may tolerate systemic corruption when the economy is strong. However, EU financial sanctions have slowed Hungary's growth, causing economic pain that fuels public anger. This anger over corruption becomes a potent political weapon for the opposition, making Viktor Orbán's regime vulnerable.

The check on authoritarian power doesn't require a majority opposition. In the U.S. Senate, a small faction of just 20 Republicans could privately threaten to join Democrats on an impeachment vote, effectively forcing the administration to reverse course. Their inaction signals political cowardice.

The argument for term limits isn't just about constitutional law; it's a fundamental recognition of human psychology. Power corrupts, and leaders who stay too long become convinced only they are right. The system is designed to forcibly introduce new perspectives and prevent the slide into tyranny, regardless of a president's popularity.

Liberal parties like the People's Party can win elections but are systematically blocked from governing. The Thai establishment uses the constitutional court to dissolve these parties and ban their leaders, leading many voters to doubt if their vote for liberal change can ever succeed.

Orbán pioneered a method to turn a democracy into an autocracy not through violence, but through complex legal, economic, and media control. This model serves as an inspiration for nationalist movements globally, including the MAGA movement in the U.S., making Hungary a critical test case.

The goal of modern populist movements has shifted from winning elections to establishing permanent dominance. This is achieved by creating a mandate to prosecute and imprison political opponents, dismantling the norm of peaceful power transitions in favor of winner-take-all retribution.

The most potent threat to an authoritarian regime comes not from visible dissidents, who are often neutralized, but from patriotic loyalists within the system. These insiders believe the current leadership is corrupt and harming the country, making their patriotism a powerful tool that can be turned against the regime.

Business leaders may see short-term benefits in aligning with an aspiring autocrat. However, this alliance is temporary. In Hungary, 15 years after Viktor Orbán took power, only 23% of the country's 50 wealthiest people remained on the list, as the regime moved to consolidate power by bankrupting or eliminating rivals.

Contrary to typical political assumptions, Hungary's election was not decided by economic performance. Instead, voter sentiment shifted to concerns over the country's drift towards Russia and away from the European Union. The desire to maintain a European identity proved to be a more powerful motivator than 'pocketbook' issues.