Deferring product innovation and design isn't just a cost-saving measure. It's an active business risk that leaves the gap between your current product and a better version open for a competitor to capture. Organizations often miscalculate this "risk of inaction."
Large companies often focus R&D on high-ticket items, neglecting smaller accessory categories. This creates a market gap for focused startups to innovate and solve specific problems that bigger players overlook, allowing them to build a defensible niche.
In ROI-focused cultures like financial services, protect innovation by dedicating a formal budget (e.g., 20% of team bandwidth) to experiments. These initiatives are explicitly exempt from the rigorous ROI calculations applied to the rest of the roadmap, which fosters necessary risk-taking.
Sales teams focus on out-competing rival products, but the biggest threat is the buyer's preference for their current "good enough" process. Losing to "no decision" is more common than losing to a competitor and requires a different strategy that focuses on the cost of inaction.
Startups often fail by making a slightly better version of an incumbent's product. This is a losing strategy because the incumbent can easily adapt. The key is to build something so fundamentally different in structure that competitors have a very hard time copying it, ensuring a durable advantage.
While adjacent, incremental innovation feels safer and is easier to get approved, Nubar Afeyan warns that everyone else is doing the same thing. This approach inevitably leads to commoditization and erodes sustainable advantage. Leaping to new possibilities is the only way to truly own a new space.
Don't just tweak last year's product plan. Start from a blank slate by defining business goals first, then allocate resources to the value propositions needed to win. This avoids getting stuck in maintenance mode and forces a focus on strategic priorities.
Businesses often get bogged down by tactical feature requests, especially commitments for a single customer. This consumes precious capacity that should be allocated to strategic initiatives, allowing competitors with a clear vision to gain an advantage.
Unlike a failed feature launch, business viability risks (e.g., wrong pricing, changing market) kill products slowly. By the time the damage is obvious, it's often too late. This makes continuous monitoring of the business model as critical as testing new features.
As the market leader, OpenAI has become risk-averse to avoid media backlash. This has “damaged the product,” making it overly cautious and less useful. Meanwhile, challengers like Google have adopted a risk-taking posture, allowing them to innovate faster. This shows how a defensive mindset can cede ground to hungrier competitors.
The misconception that discovery slows down delivery is dangerous. Like stretching before a race prevents injury, proper, time-boxed discovery prevents building the wrong thing. This avoids costly code rewrites and iterative launches that miss the mark, ultimately speeding up the delivery of a successful product.