The 1990s belief that economic liberalization would inevitably make China democratic provided ideological cover for policies that fueled its growth. This hubris, combined with corporate greed, allowed the US to facilitate the rise of its greatest geopolitical rival without achieving the expected political reforms.

China's economic ascent began when Deng Xiaoping invited American experts to teach them about capitalism. This strategy, combined with becoming the world's manufacturing hub, allowed them to learn the system, grow strong quietly, and eventually become a dominant global power.

Deng Xiaoping’s reforms, which ignited China’s growth, were based on adopting American free-market principles like private enterprise and foreign capital. China’s success stemmed from decentralizing its economy, the very system the U.S. is now tempted to abandon for a more centralized model.

Ed Luttwak identifies a recurring historical pattern of self-sabotage. Imperial Germany challenged the British Royal Navy, which protected its global commerce. Today, China challenges the US Navy, which secures the sea lanes vital for Chinese trade. This is a recurring strategic error driven by a misplaced desire for military parity.

With its domestic, investment-led growth model broken, China has pivoted to an export-heavy strategy. This significant shift creates new vulnerabilities as it must fight for a shrinking pie of global demand amid rising protectionism.

China is completely dependent on US-policed sea lanes for oil and food. The U.S. could trigger a civilizational collapse, potentially killing half the population, by simply using a few destroyers to stop energy and food flows near Singapore. This can be done without a direct military confrontation on Chinese soil.

Contrary to common perception, China holds the stronger hand in its relationship with the U.S. As the world's creditor and primary producer, China can sell its goods to billions of other global consumers. The U.S., as a debtor and consumer nation, is far more dependent on China than the other way around.

The U.S. established the global order not through force, but by offering a deal: it would guarantee global security for shipping and keep its markets open, provided allies allowed the U.S. to write their security policies. This successfully aligned major world powers under U.S. command against the Soviets.

After WWII, the U.S. used its naval dominance to guarantee global trade. In exchange for writing its allies' security policies, it allowed open access to its market. This economic "unfairness" was the strategic cost of building a global coalition against the Soviet Union, effectively bribing nations into an alliance.