Unlike traditional deterministic products, AI models are probabilistic; the same query can yield different results. This uncertainty requires designers, PMs, and engineers to align on flexible expectations rather than fixed workflows, fundamentally changing the nature of collaboration.

Related Insights

The creative process with AI involves exploring many options, most of which are imperfect. This makes the collaboration a version control problem. Users need tools to easily branch, suggest, review, and merge ideas, much like developers use Git, to manage the AI's prolific but often flawed output.

AI will make the traditional "product pod" structure obsolete for design. Designers, empowered to learn contexts faster and cover more ground, will operate in a more fluid, centralized team. They will be deployed across entire user journeys that span multiple teams, rather than being calcified within a single product area.

Early AI adoption by PMs is often a 'single-player' activity. The next step is a 'multiplayer' experience where the entire team operates from a shared AI knowledge base, which breaks down silos by automatically signaling dependencies and overlapping work.

Dylan Field predicts that AI tools will blur the lines between design, engineering, and product management. Instead of siloed functions, teams will consist of 'product builders' who can contribute across domains but maintain a deep craft in one area. Design becomes even more critical in this new world.

In AI, low prototyping costs and customer uncertainty make the traditional research-first PM model obsolete. The new approach is to build a prototype quickly, show it to customers to discover possibilities, and then iterate based on their reactions, effectively building the solution before the problem is fully defined.

OpenAI operates with a "truly bottoms-up" structure because it's impossible to create rigid long-term plans when model capabilities are advancing unpredictably. They aim fuzzily at a 1-year+ horizon but rely on empirical, rapid experimentation for short-term product development, embracing the uncertainty.

It's a common misconception that advancing AI reduces the need for human input. In reality, the probabilistic nature of AI demands increased human interaction and tighter collaboration among product, design, and engineering teams to align goals and navigate uncertainty.

Unlike deterministic SaaS software that works consistently, AI is probabilistic and doesn't work perfectly out of the box. Achieving 'human-grade' performance (e.g., 99.9% reliability) requires continuous tuning and expert guidance, countering the hype that AI is an immediate, hands-off solution.

As AI tools empower individuals to handle tasks across the entire product development lifecycle, traditional, siloed roles are merging. This fundamental shift challenges how tech professionals define their value and contribution, causing significant professional anxiety.

The traditional "assembly line" model of product development (PM -> Design -> Eng) fails with AI. Instead, teams must operate like a "jazz band," where roles are fluid, members "riff" off each other's work, and territorialism is a failure mode. PMs might code and designers might write specs.