The creative process with AI involves exploring many options, most of which are imperfect. This makes the collaboration a version control problem. Users need tools to easily branch, suggest, review, and merge ideas, much like developers use Git, to manage the AI's prolific but often flawed output.
Related Insights
AI development tools can be "resistant," ignoring change requests. A powerful technique is to prompt the AI to consider multiple options and ask for your choice before building. This prevents it from making incorrect unilateral decisions, such as applying a navigation change to the entire site by mistake.
Tools like Git were designed for human-paced development. AI agents, which can make thousands of changes in parallel, require a new infrastructure layer—real-time repositories, coordination mechanisms, and shared memory—that traditional systems cannot support.
A powerful workflow is to explicitly instruct your AI to act as a collaborative thinking partner—asking questions and organizing thoughts—while strictly forbidding it from creating final artifacts. This separates the crucial thinking phase from the generative phase, leading to better outcomes.
When an AI coding assistant goes off track, it can be hard to undo the damage. Developer Terry Lynn mitigates this risk by programming his AI workflow to make a Git commit before and after each small phase of a task. This creates a trail of "breadcrumbs," allowing him to easily revert to a stable state if the AI makes a mistake.
Users mistakenly evaluate AI tools based on the quality of the first output. However, since 90% of the work is iterative, the superior tool is the one that handles a high volume of refinement prompts most effectively, not the one with the best initial result.
When building for AI-powered environments, design tools to be equally usable by humans and the AI model. An elegant, simple design for humans often translates directly into an effective tool for AI agents, simplifying development and promoting shared logic.
Using AI agents in shared Slack channels transforms coding from a solo activity into a collaborative one. Multiple team members can observe the agent's work, provide corrective feedback in the same thread, and collectively guide the task to completion, fostering shared knowledge.
The most creative use of AI isn't a single-shot generation. It's a continuous feedback loop. Designers should treat AI outputs as intermediate "throughputs"—artifacts to be edited in traditional tools and then fed back into the AI model as new inputs. This iterative remixing process is where happy accidents and true innovation occur.
The ideal AI-powered engineering workflow isn't just one tool, but a fluid cycle. It involves synchronous collaboration with an AI for planning and review, then handing off to an asynchronous agent for implementation and testing, before returning to synchronous mode for the next phase.
The promise of AI shouldn't be a one-click solution that removes the user. Instead, AI should be a collaborative partner that augments human capacity. A successful AI product leaves room for user participation, making them feel like they are co-building the experience and have a stake in the outcome.
