A common pattern for developers building with generative media is to use two types of models. A cheaper, lower-quality 'workhorse' model is used for high-volume tasks like prototyping. A second, expensive, state-of-the-art 'hero' model is then reserved for the final, high-quality output, optimizing for cost and quality.
Related Insights
Box CEO Aaron Levie advises against building complex workarounds for the limitations of cheaper, older AI models. This "scaffolding" becomes obsolete with each new model release. To stay competitive, companies must absorb the cost of using the best available model, as competitors will certainly do so.
Advanced generative media workflows are not simple text-to-video prompts. Top customers chain an average of 14 different models for tasks like image generation, upscaling, and image-to-video transitions. This multi-model complexity is a key reason developers prefer open-source for its granular control over each step.
Recognizing there is no single "best" LLM, AlphaSense built a system to test and deploy various models for different tasks. This allows them to optimize for performance and even stylistic preferences, using different models for their buy-side finance clients versus their corporate users.
The computational requirements for generative media scale dramatically across modalities. If a 200-token LLM prompt costs 1 unit of compute, a single image costs 100x that, and a 5-second video costs another 100x on top of that—a 10,000x total increase. 4K video adds another 10x multiplier.
High productivity isn't about using AI for everything. It's a disciplined workflow: breaking a task into sub-problems, using an LLM for high-leverage parts like scaffolding and tests, and reserving human focus for the core implementation. This avoids the sunk cost of forcing AI on unsuitable tasks.
Building a single, all-purpose AI is like hiring one person for every company role. To maximize accuracy and creativity, build multiple custom GPTs, each trained for a specific function like copywriting or operations, and have them collaborate.
Initially, even OpenAI believed a single, ultimate 'model to rule them all' would emerge. This thinking has completely changed to favor a proliferation of specialized models, creating a healthier, less winner-take-all ecosystem where different models serve different needs.
Pega's CTO advises using the powerful reasoning of LLMs to design processes and marketing offers. However, at runtime, switch to faster, cheaper, and more consistent predictive models. This avoids the unpredictability, cost, and risk of calling expensive LLMs for every live customer interaction.
Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.
Instead of offering a model selector, creating a proprietary, branded model allows a company to chain different specialized models for various sub-tasks (e.g., search, generation). This not only improves overall performance but also provides business independence from the pricing and launch cycles of a single frontier model lab.