Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The European Central Bank's rate-hiking cycle is unlikely to be as long as markets expect. Unlike in 2022, the ECB isn't starting from deeply negative rates, reducing the need for an aggressive "catch-up" cycle. Risks are skewed towards fewer hikes than the 70-75 basis points currently priced by the market.

Related Insights

Contrary to typical FX reactions, hawkish ECB policy amid an energy shock would be profoundly negative for growth. Any rate hikes would compound the economic damage from higher energy prices, making the Euro more vulnerable.

With the European Central Bank firmly on hold, a low-volatility regime is expected to persist. However, the options market is not fully pricing in the potential for directional curve movements, such as steepening or flattening. This creates opportunities to express curve views through options where the risk is undervalued.

A significant policy divergence is expected in Europe. The ECB is forecast to hold rates steady, balancing cyclical growth against structural weaknesses. In contrast, the Bank of England is projected to deliver three cuts, driven by the UK's unique combination of rising unemployment and a rapidly improving inflation outlook.

Markets pricing in ECB rate hikes after an energy shock is flawed. Higher energy prices are a negative growth impulse for Europe, hurting terms of trade and consumer spending. Hiking rates would only worsen the downturn, making European cyclicals and the Euro vulnerable regardless of policy.

ECB President Lagarde's statement that disinflation is over is likely a backward-looking comment on the progress from 10% inflation. However, the ECB’s own forward-looking forecasts project inflation will fall below its 2% target, suggesting that future rate cuts are more likely than the confident public rhetoric implies.

Contradicting ECB President Lagarde, Morgan Stanley's economists believe the disinflationary process in the Euro Area is not over. They forecast an underlying output gap will cause inflation to undershoot its 2% target, necessitating two more rate cuts from the ECB in 2026.

Morgan Stanley holds a contrarian view that the European Central Bank will cut rates in June and September. This is based on the expectation that an upcoming inflation print will fall below the ECB's target, fundamentally shifting the policy debate. A below-target reading would reverse the burden of proof, forcing policymakers to justify not easing policy further.

A significant split in monetary policy is expected in 2026. The US Federal Reserve and European Central Bank are predicted to cut rates in response to slowing growth and easing inflation. In stark contrast, the Bank of Japan is on a hiking cycle, aiming to reflate its economy.

Unlike the US Fed, the European Central Bank is expected to raise interest rates in response to the energy shock. This is because its single mandate focuses purely on inflation, and Europe historically experiences stronger 'second-round effects' where energy prices lead to broader wage increases.

The European Central Bank is expected to lean hawkish in response to the conflict's impact on energy prices. Historical precedent from similar crises suggests their internal analysis frames such events as an inflationary threat first and a growth threat second, meaning they are unlikely to counter market expectations for rate hikes.