A significant policy divergence is expected in Europe. The ECB is forecast to hold rates steady, balancing cyclical growth against structural weaknesses. In contrast, the Bank of England is projected to deliver three cuts, driven by the UK's unique combination of rising unemployment and a rapidly improving inflation outlook.

Markets pricing in ECB rate hikes after an energy shock is flawed. Higher energy prices are a negative growth impulse for Europe, hurting terms of trade and consumer spending. Hiking rates would only worsen the downturn, making European cyclicals and the Euro vulnerable regardless of policy.

ECB President Lagarde's statement that disinflation is over is likely a backward-looking comment on the progress from 10% inflation. However, the ECB’s own forward-looking forecasts project inflation will fall below its 2% target, suggesting that future rate cuts are more likely than the confident public rhetoric implies.

Contradicting ECB President Lagarde, Morgan Stanley's economists believe the disinflationary process in the Euro Area is not over. They forecast an underlying output gap will cause inflation to undershoot its 2% target, necessitating two more rate cuts from the ECB in 2026.

While initial energy price spikes boost short-term inflation expectations, a sustained shock eventually hurts economic growth. This growth concern acts as a natural ceiling on long-term inflation expectations (break-evens), as markets anticipate an economic slowdown, preventing them from rising indefinitely.

Morgan Stanley holds a contrarian view that the European Central Bank will cut rates in June and September. This is based on the expectation that an upcoming inflation print will fall below the ECB's target, fundamentally shifting the policy debate. A below-target reading would reverse the burden of proof, forcing policymakers to justify not easing policy further.

It's the volatility and unpredictability within the supply chain environment—rather than the magnitude of a single shock—that can dramatically amplify the inflationary effects of other events, like energy price spikes. This suggests central banks need situation-specific responses.

An oil supply shock initially appears hawkishly inflationary, prompting central banks to hold or raise rates. However, once prices cross a critical threshold (e.g., >$100/barrel), it triggers severe demand destruction and recession, forcing a rapid policy reversal towards aggressive rate cuts.

The knee-jerk reaction to a geopolitical shock is often a bond market rally (flight to safety). However, if the shock impacts supply (e.g., oil), the market can quickly reverse. It pivots from pricing geopolitical risk to pricing the risk of persistent inflation, forcing yields higher in anticipation of rate hikes.