Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Contrary to typical FX reactions, hawkish ECB policy amid an energy shock would be profoundly negative for growth. Any rate hikes would compound the economic damage from higher energy prices, making the Euro more vulnerable.

Related Insights

The bullish case for the Euro is weakening as growth signals outside the U.S. lose intensity. Critically, all of J.P. Morgan's developed market economic activity surprise indices have now fallen into negative territory, posing a significant challenge to the Euro's cyclical strength against the dollar.

Markets pricing in ECB rate hikes after an energy shock is flawed. Higher energy prices are a negative growth impulse for Europe, hurting terms of trade and consumer spending. Hiking rates would only worsen the downturn, making European cyclicals and the Euro vulnerable regardless of policy.

ECB President Lagarde's statement that disinflation is over is likely a backward-looking comment on the progress from 10% inflation. However, the ECB’s own forward-looking forecasts project inflation will fall below its 2% target, suggesting that future rate cuts are more likely than the confident public rhetoric implies.

Contradicting ECB President Lagarde, Morgan Stanley's economists believe the disinflationary process in the Euro Area is not over. They forecast an underlying output gap will cause inflation to undershoot its 2% target, necessitating two more rate cuts from the ECB in 2026.

While initial energy price spikes boost short-term inflation expectations, a sustained shock eventually hurts economic growth. This growth concern acts as a natural ceiling on long-term inflation expectations (break-evens), as markets anticipate an economic slowdown, preventing them from rising indefinitely.

Morgan Stanley holds a contrarian view that the European Central Bank will cut rates in June and September. This is based on the expectation that an upcoming inflation print will fall below the ECB's target, fundamentally shifting the policy debate. A below-target reading would reverse the burden of proof, forcing policymakers to justify not easing policy further.

A significant split in monetary policy is expected in 2026. The US Federal Reserve and European Central Bank are predicted to cut rates in response to slowing growth and easing inflation. In stark contrast, the Bank of Japan is on a hiking cycle, aiming to reflate its economy.

An oil supply shock initially appears hawkishly inflationary, prompting central banks to hold or raise rates. However, once prices cross a critical threshold (e.g., >$100/barrel), it triggers severe demand destruction and recession, forcing a rapid policy reversal towards aggressive rate cuts.

Despite facing similar pressures like high inflation and slowing labor markets, the US Federal Reserve is cutting rates while European central banks remain on hold. This significant policy divergence is expected to weaken the U.S. dollar and create cross-Atlantic investment opportunities.

The European Central Bank is expected to lean hawkish in response to the conflict's impact on energy prices. Historical precedent from similar crises suggests their internal analysis frames such events as an inflationary threat first and a growth threat second, meaning they are unlikely to counter market expectations for rate hikes.

Potential European Central Bank Rate Hikes Are a Bearish, Not Bullish, Signal for the Euro | RiffOn