A restrictive stance on mergers and acquisitions stifles the entire startup ecosystem by removing viable exit paths. Allowing M&A to flourish provides the liquidity events that encourage venture capitalists to deploy risk capital into the next generation of innovative companies.

Despite stated goals to build a strong domestic AI industry, governments like the UK procure the vast majority of their AI services from foreign companies. This sends a negative signal about local technology and fails to create an internal market, starving homegrown AI companies of crucial revenue.

Unlike traditional SaaS where a bootstrapped company could eventually catch up to funded rivals, the AI landscape is different. The high, ongoing cost of talent and compute means an early capital advantage becomes a permanent, widening moat, making it nearly impossible for capital-light players to compete.

The UK is leveraging its post-Brexit autonomy to create a more favorable regulatory environment for AI and tech compared to the EU. This "pro-business" pragmatism, demonstrated during a recent state visit, has successfully attracted tens of billions in investment commitments from US tech giants like Microsoft, Google, and NVIDIA.

In capital-intensive sectors, the idea is secondary to the founder's ability to act as a magnet. Their primary function is to relentlessly attract elite talent and secure continuous funding to survive long development timelines before revenue.

A toxic combination of a high tax burden and a cultural climate that treats successful entrepreneurs as "evil" is driving them to leave the country. This creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of pessimism, as the very people needed for growth and innovation are incentivized to relocate.

The immense salaries in software and finance may create a 'talent Dutch disease,' pulling the brightest minds from crucial fields like structural engineering. This reallocation of human capital could explain why productivity has stagnated or declined in industries that build the physical world.

Europe's economic underperformance is caused by a governance structure that is not just indifferent but actively hostile to its entrepreneurial class. This 'regulatory malice' and 'contempt' makes it prohibitively difficult to build, innovate, and capture upside, driving away talent and capital.

Europe has vibrant startup scenes, but its core challenge is the "scale-up" phase. Promising companies often relocate to the U.S. to access deeper venture capital markets and a larger, more unified customer base for international expansion.