In times of strategic ambiguity, teams can become paralyzed. An effective director doesn't wait for perfect clarity from above. They step into the vacuum, interpret available signals, and create a clear line-of-sight connecting their team's work to broader business objectives, even if it's imperfect.
Related Insights
A significant gap exists between leadership's strategic decisions and the team's ability to implement them. Leaders assume that mission statements or strategic pillars are self-explanatory, but frontline workers often lack clarity on how these goals translate into daily tasks, leading to wasted effort and misalignment.
When facing ambiguity, the best strategy is not to wait for perfect information but to engage in "sense-making." This involves taking small, strategic actions, gathering data from them, and progressively building an understanding of the situation, rather than being paralyzed by analysis.
A leader's value isn't being the expert in every marketing function. It's identifying a critical problem, even one they don't fully understand, and taking ownership to push it forward. This often means acting as a project manager: booking the meeting, getting the right people in the room, and driving action items.
Leaders set direction from a strategic vantage point but lack visibility into on-the-ground realities. It is your responsibility as an individual contributor to proactively communicate unforeseen challenges and propose better paths based on what you encounter directly.
When senior leadership provides vague direction, waiting for clarity is a losing strategy. The team leader must define their own short-term goals or "mile markers." These anchors provide a sense of progress and purpose, even if the long-term destination is unknown.
Former BetterRx CEO Ben Clark sets the expectation that his leaders should be ahead of him 90% of the time, bringing him well-formed plans to critique rather than asking for direction. This empowers domain experts to truly own their space and frees the CEO to focus on high-level strategy and support.
A coaching-based leadership style is valuable for engagement but can fail in ambiguity. When a team struggles to find a "red thread" connecting their work, the leader must switch from asking questions to providing a clear, assertive frame and setting direction.
The transition from manager to director requires a shift from managing tactical details to 'directing.' A director's value comes from high-level strategy, cross-departmental resource connection, and solving organizational problems, not from knowing more than their direct reports.
Ben Horowitz suggests a leader's primary role in decision-making is often to provide clarity, which unblocks the team and allows them to move forward. The organization needs a clear direction more than a perfect answer. This is achieved by staying in the details and being accessible, not by dictating every solution.
When strategic direction is unclear due to leadership changes, waiting for clarity leads to stagnation. The better approach is to create a draft plan with the explicit understanding it may be discarded. This provides a starting point for new leadership and maintains team momentum, so long as you are psychologically prepared to pivot.