We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Given the choice between a revenue goal and a feature-shipping goal, many PMs choose the latter. It's an easier, more controllable path, even if it delivers less business value. This reveals a systemic flaw in how many organizations measure and incentivize the product function, rewarding activity over impact.
Cascading OKRs through multiple layers (company to department to team to individual) often results in "OKR theater" where the connection to business impact is lost. Instead, an individual product manager's goals should be no more than one link away from a core business objective that leadership cares about.
It's not enough to improve engagement or NPS. A product manager's job is to understand and articulate how that metric connects to a financial outcome for the business. Whether it's growth, margin, or profitability, you must explain to leadership why your product goals matter to the bottom line.
Measuring engineering success with metrics like velocity and deployment frequency (DORA) incentivizes shipping code quickly, not creating customer value. This focus on output can actively discourage the deep product thinking required for true innovation.
Most features don't have direct, attributable revenue. Forcing feature-level ROI calculations leads to flawed logic and kills morale. Product leaders should instead prove their entire portfolio is "earning its keep" by generating a multiple of its cost.
With only 12% of product teams finding profit-centric goals rewarding, leaders must reframe work. By connecting business outcomes to the emotional, human progress customers are trying to make, leaders can inspire teams far more effectively than with revenue targets alone.
The "hamster wheel of execution" persists because performance reviews and incentives overwhelmingly focus on shipped features. Until companies tangibly reward strategic vision and planning, PMs will continue to prioritize execution, regardless of time saved by tools like AI.
Shift your team's language from tracking output (e.g., 'deployed XYZ API') to tracking outcomes. Reframe milestones to focus on the business capability you have 'unlocked' for other teams. This small linguistic change reorients the team toward business impact and clarifies your contribution to metrics like NPS.
Don't build a feature roadmap and then write OKRs to justify it. Instead, start with the outcome you want to achieve (e.g., "move metric X to Y"). This frames all features as experiments designed to hit that goal, empowering teams to kill features that don't deliver value.
Shift the team's language and metrics away from output. Instead of celebrating a deployed API, measure and report on what that API enabled for other teams and the business. This directly connects platform work to tangible results and impact.
A common founder mistake is hiring a first product manager to simply prioritize and ship a backlog of ideas. Instead, PMs create the most value when given ownership of a key metric and the autonomy to drive user and business outcomes.