If a salesperson sells all available inventory but still misses quota due to the company's inability to produce more, they should negotiate to be paid commission on their full potential. The argument is that the failure to hit the target was an operational issue, not a sales performance issue.
To maximize earnings, salespeople shouldn't just passively accept a comp plan. They should actively engage with the compensation team or their manager to understand the plan's underlying business intent. This proactive approach uncovers the true priorities and reveals the most effective path to higher earnings.
By fixing the upfront cash collection, the business generates enough surplus to potentially double sales commissions from $50 to $100 per deal. This elevated pay structure attracts a completely different caliber of salesperson—"an order of magnitude better"—who can close more deals per day, dramatically accelerating growth without adding financial risk.
The most effective way for a salesperson to challenge a perceived unfair quota is not through complaints, but through data. By presenting an analysis of their own average deal size, sales cycle length, and win rates, they can build a logical case for what is achievable and force a more constructive conversation with leadership.
In businesses with production constraints, the sales process must shift from broad outreach to strategic allocation. By creating profiles for each customer, a salesperson can offer scarce products to their best accounts first, maximizing revenue and strengthening key relationships when supply is limited.
Don't finalize a comp plan in an executive silo. Share the draft with trusted, top-performing reps and ask them to break it. They will immediately spot loopholes and unintended incentives, allowing you to create a more robust plan that drives the right behaviors from day one.
Salespeople's biggest frustration with comp plans is being held accountable for outcomes they can't directly influence. This perceived unfairness is a primary driver of attrition, making it critical to align incentives strictly with a seller's direct responsibilities and control.
Sales reps often feel overwhelmed by their large annual number. The key is to break it down, subtract predictable existing business, and focus solely on the smaller, incremental revenue needed. This makes the goal feel achievable and maintains motivation.
Focusing intensely on the sales number, especially when behind, leads to desperate behavior. Customers sense this "commission breath" and back away. Instead, salespeople should forget the outcome and focus exclusively on executing the correct daily behaviors, which builds trust and leads to more sales.
Salespeople are trained to find leverage and improve outcomes. Their tendency to critique compensation plans stems from the same skill set that makes them effective sellers. Leaders should view this behavior as a sign of a good salesperson, not just negativity, and address it with transparency.
To handle 'bluebird' deals without demotivating reps, avoid hard caps. Instead, implement a policy where commissions exceeding a high threshold (e.g., 400% of variable pay) are 'subject to review.' This protects the company from unearned windfalls while maintaining unlimited potential for legitimate efforts.