In a functional market, raw material (cattle) and end-product (beef) prices move together. Due to high consolidation in meatpacking, packers can increase consumer beef prices while suppressing prices paid to ranchers, creating an inverse relationship and capturing the spread.

Related Insights

The US has lost over half its cattle operations in a generation, and the average rancher is now over 58. A long-term "cost-price squeeze" has made the profession financially unattractive, leading families to encourage their children to pursue other careers and threatening the industry's future labor supply.

Meatpackers use cheaper foreign beef to drive down prices paid to domestic ranchers. Because this beef lacks country-of-origin labeling, retailers sell it at the same high price as domestic beef, capturing the entire margin instead of passing savings to consumers.

A record harvest of corn and soybeans, coupled with lower demand from China, created a surplus of turkey feed. This supply chain effect directly lowered input costs for farmers, resulting in a significant 14% Thanksgiving turkey price drop for end consumers.

A significant divergence exists in agricultural markets: the FAO Food Price Index shows physical prices at their strongest since 2022, yet futures-based indices are down over 4%. This gap is driven by short investor positioning and suggests a major tension between real-world supply tightness and speculative trading.

Normally, high prices signal producers to increase supply. However, cattle ranchers, having experienced a sudden price collapse in 2015 after a period of record highs, no longer trust that current high prices will be sustained. This boom-bust memory breaks the typical economic supply-response cycle.

Recent streaming price increases, which are vastly outpacing inflation, serve as the primary evidence that the market is already too consolidated. Further mergers would grant companies like Netflix unchecked pricing power, transferring wealth from consumers and labor directly to shareholders in an oligopolistic environment.

In 1980, cattle producers received over 60 cents of every consumer dollar spent on beef. Due to market consolidation, this has reversed. By 2021, packers and retailers captured over 60 cents, while producers received less than 40 cents, despite bearing the longest production risk.

For 50 years, commodity prices moved together, driven by synchronized global demand. J.P. Morgan identifies a breakdown of this trend since 2024, dubbing it the 'crocodile cycle,' where supply-side factors cause metals to outperform while energy underperforms, creating a widening gap like a crocodile's mouth.

Despite high packer profitability, new processing plants struggle to enter the market. The four largest packers control 80% of the market and have long-term contracts for shelf space with major retailers, effectively locking out smaller, independent competitors from accessing consumers.

Major corporations are applying the vertical integration model from poultry ("chickenization") to beef. This system controls the supply chain from genetics to retail, aiming to eliminate the competitive cash market and turn independent ranchers into de facto contract growers.