AI has made knowledge—the ability to produce information—cheap and accessible. The new currency is wisdom: knowing what matters, where to focus, and how to find purpose. This shifts the focus of work and education from learning facts to developing critical thinking, empathy, and judgment.

Schools ban AI like ChatGPT fearing it's a tool for cheating, but this is profoundly shortsighted. The quality of an AI's output is entirely dependent on the critical thinking behind the user's input. This makes AI the first truly scalable tool for teaching children how to think critically, a skill far more valuable than memorization.

The primary barrier to enterprise AI adoption isn't the technology, but the workforce's inability to use it. The tech has far outpaced user capability. Leaders should spend 90% of their AI budget on educating employees on core skills, like prompting, to unlock its full potential.

Due to a lack of conclusive research on AI's learning benefits, a top-down mandate is risky. Instead, AI analyst Johan Falk advises letting interested teachers experiment and discover what works for their specific students and classroom contexts.

ASU's president argues that if an AI can answer an assignment, the assignment has failed. The educator's role must evolve to use AI to 'up the game,' forcing students to ask more sophisticated questions, making the quality of the query—not the synthesized answer—the hallmark of learning.

In an age where AI can produce passable work, an educator's primary role shifts. Instead of focusing solely on the mechanics of a skill like writing, the more crucial and AI-proof job is to inspire students and convince them of the intrinsic value of learning that skill for themselves.

AI makes cheating easier, undermining grades as a motivator. More importantly, it enables continuous, nuanced assessment that renders one-off standardized tests obsolete. This forces a necessary shift from a grade-driven to a learning-driven education system.

To remain relevant, universities need a radical overhaul. Economist Tyler Cowen suggests dedicating one-third of higher education to teaching students how to use AI. The remaining two-thirds should focus on fundamental skills like in-person writing instruction and practical life skills like personal finance.

Instead of allowing AI to atrophy critical thinking by providing instant answers, leverage its "guided learning" capabilities. These features teach the process of solving a problem rather than just giving the solution, turning AI into a Socratic mentor that can accelerate learning and problem-solving abilities.