Contrary to long-standing Freudian psychiatric theory, which posits that unresolved anger in ambivalent relationships prolongs grief, empirical data shows the opposite. People in relationships with more conflict and mixed feelings actually experience less intense grief after a loss, upending a core therapeutic assumption.

Related Insights

Grief is not a linear set of stages but an oscillation. People naturally shift between focusing inward on their loss and focusing outward on daily life. This dynamic process allows for both the recalibration of their internal world and continued engagement with external responsibilities.

Conflict in friendships should be welcomed, not avoided. The psychotherapeutic concept of 'rupture and repair' — a breach in the relationship followed by its restoration — is proof of a strong connection. Actively working through conflict facilitates growth, respect, and a deeper bond.

Society mistakenly correlates the length of mourning with the amount of love felt. This is a false narrative. You can love someone profoundly and still choose to recover your behavioral baseline quickly. A rapid recovery doesn't diminish the love; it's simply a choice about how to respond to loss.

Contrary to popular wellness narratives, denial can be a productive short-term response to trauma. It's nature's way of letting in only as much pain as we can handle, providing a sense of control and hope when we need it most to remain resilient.

The common assumption that heartbreak is purely negative is flawed. Instead of causing you to close off, experiencing and moving through the pain of heartbreak actually breaks your heart open, increasing your ability to love more deeply in the future. Avoiding this pain is what leads to trauma and closure, not the heartbreak itself.

Contrary to the belief that closing your heart protects you from pain, the act of closing down is inherently painful. We are conditioned to believe an open heart leads to being taken advantage of, but historical examples and personal experience suggest this correlation is weak. The real pain comes from suppressing forgiveness and connection.

Contrary to intuition, relationships mixing positive and negative interactions are often more damaging than those that are consistently demeaning. The uncertainty and emotional volatility of these ambivalent connections are more toxic and draining, making them a higher priority to address or remove from your life.

The success of a long-term relationship is better predicted by how partners handle conflict and disagreement than by how much they enjoy good times together. People are more likely to break up due to poor conflict resolution than a lack of peak experiences.

Conflict avoidance is not a sign of a healthy relationship. True intimacy is built through cycles of 'rupture and repair,' where disagreements are used as opportunities for deeper understanding. A relationship without conflict may be fragile, as its ability to repair has never been tested.

To heal a relational wound, one must revisit the original feeling within a new, safe relationship. The healing occurs when this context provides a "disconfirming experience"—a different, positive outcome that meets the original unmet need and neurologically rewrites the pattern.

Ambivalent Relationships Lead to Less Grief After a Spouse’s Death, Not More | RiffOn