Many late-stage investors focus heavily on data and metrics, forgetting that the quality of the leadership team remains as critical as in the seed stage. A new CEO, for example, can completely pivot a large company and reignite growth, a factor that quantitative analysis often misses.

Sacerdote inverts his long-only framework to identify shorting opportunities. This includes technologies that are too early for adoption (e.g., early VR), companies lacking a competitive advantage within a real trend (e.g., non-Apple smartphone makers), or mature businesses being disrupted by a new S-curve.

During a fundamental technology shift like the current AI wave, traditional market size analysis is pointless because new markets and behaviors are being created. Investors should de-emphasize TAM and instead bet on founders who have a clear, convicted vision for how the world will change.

Alex Sacerdote's investment thesis identifies technologies at their adoption inflection point (S-curve), finds companies with strong competitive advantages within that trend, and capitalizes on the resulting exponential, often overlooked, earnings growth. This three-part framework guides their entire investment process for technology stocks.

The ultimate differentiator for CEOs over decades isn't just product, but their skill as a capital allocator. Once a company generates cash, the CEO's job shifts to investing it wisely through M&A, R&D, and buybacks, a skill few are trained for but the best master.

Top-performing, founder-led businesses often don't want to sell control. A non-control investment strategy allows access to this exclusive deal flow, tapping into the "founder alpha" from high skin-in-the-game leaders who consistently outperform hired CEOs.

Companies like Amazon (from books to cloud) and Intuitive Surgical (from one specific surgery to many) became massive winners by creating new markets, not just conquering existing ones. Investors should prioritize businesses with the innovative capacity to expand their TAM, as initial market sizes are often misleadingly small.

When evaluating revolutionary ideas, traditional Total Addressable Market (TAM) analysis is useless. VCs should instead bet on founders with a "world-bending vision" capable of inducing a new market, not just capturing an existing one. Have the humility to admit you can't predict market size and instead back the visionary founder.

Standard valuation models based on financial outputs (earnings, cash flow) are flawed because they ignore the most critical inputs: the CEO's value, brand strength, and company culture. These unquantifiable factors are the true drivers of long-term outperformance for companies like Apple.