Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

True taste isn't just recognizing good design; it's the judgment of when to innovate versus when to adhere to established patterns. This discernment, the ability to zoom in and out, is a uniquely human skill that current AI models cannot replicate.

Related Insights

There is a critical distinction between good and great taste. Good taste is defined by understanding and operating effectively within the established rules and traditions of a domain. Greatness is achieved only after mastering those rules and then intentionally breaking them to create something new and influential.

As AI and shared component libraries make consistent UIs the norm, adhering to a design system is no longer enough. The new key to differentiation is strategically breaking from the system to create unique, brand-defining moments that make an end user 'feel' something.

As AI democratizes the ability to build products, the competitive advantage shifts from technical skill to the ability to appeal to human emotion and aesthetics. Having 'good taste'—knowing what will resonate with people—becomes a crucial differentiator for attracting and retaining customers.

Technical talent is not the primary driver of resonant creative work. The key ingredient is 'taste'—an unteachable ability to discern what will be emotionally pleasing and impactful to an audience. This intuitive sense separates good creators from great ones.

As AI democratizes the technical aspects of content creation, the ability to guide it with unique perspective, craft, and taste becomes the key differentiator. AI is a powerful tool for experts to scale their vision, but it cannot replace the vision itself.

Concepts like good taste or judgment aren't magical human traits but are a form of "embedded measurement" in our brains. This data, collected through unique, lived experiences (especially edge cases), is not yet digitized and thus remains a key differentiator from AI models trained on public data.

Since AI learns from and replicates existing data, human creators can stay ahead by intentionally breaking those patterns. AR Rahman suggests that the future of creativity lies in making unconventional choices that a predictive model would not anticipate.

As AI commoditizes the 'how' of building products, the most critical human skills become the 'what' and 'why.' Product sense (knowing ingredients for a great product) and product taste (discerning what’s missing) will become far more valuable than process management.

The concept of "taste" is demystified as the crucial human act of defining boundaries for what is good or right. An LLM, having seen everything, lacks opinion. Without a human specifying these constraints, AI will only produce generic, undesirable output—or "AI slop." The creator's opinion is the essential ingredient.

Despite AI's ability to generate functional code, replicating the nuanced, subjective quality of a specific designer's "taste" remains extremely difficult. Felix Lee, after spending weeks attempting to codify his own taste into an AI model with little success, notes it's a significant unsolved challenge.