The reason for the Fed's rate cuts is critical. A "good" cycle with firm growth and declining inflation leads to strong commodity returns. Conversely, a "bad" cycle with decelerating growth and sticky inflation results in negative returns, making the 'why' more important than the 'what'.

Related Insights

For commodities to benefit from reflation, rising inflation alone is not sufficient. It must be accompanied by a genuine economic and industrial rebound, indicated by rising Purchasing Managers' Indexes (PMIs). This combination dramatically improves commodity returns, especially for energy and industrial metals.

Keith McCullough's core process categorizes the economy into four "quads" based on the accelerating or decelerating rates of change for GDP growth and inflation. Each quad has a predictable asset allocation playbook, with Quad 2 (both accelerating) being the best and Quad 4 (both slowing) being the worst for investors.

The market believes the Fed is more likely to ease on weak data than tighten on strong data. This perceived asymmetry in its reaction function effectively cuts off the 'negative tail risk' for global growth, making high-yielding emerging market carry trades a particularly favorable strategy in the current environment.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, a rate cut is not automatically negative for a currency. In economies like Sweden or the Eurozone, a cut can be perceived as growth-positive, thereby supporting the currency. This contrasts with situations like New Zealand, where cuts are a response to poor data and are thus currency-negative, highlighting the importance of economic context.

According to BlackRock's CIO Rick Reeder, the critical metric for the economy isn't the Fed Funds Rate, but a stable 10-year Treasury yield. This stability lowers volatility in the mortgage market, which is far more impactful for real-world borrowing, corporate funding, and international investor confidence.

In shallow easing cycles, historical data shows Treasury yields don't bottom on the day of the final rate cut. Instead, they typically hit their low point one to two months prior, signaling a rebound even as the Fed completes its easing actions.

The disinflationary impact from goods prices has largely run its course in emerging markets. The remaining inflation is concentrated in the service sector, which is sticky and less responsive to monetary policy. This structural shift means the broad rate-cutting cycle is nearing its end, as central banks have limited tools to address services inflation.

The FOMC's recent rate cut marks the end of preemptive, "risk management" cuts designed to insure against potential future risks. Future policy changes will now be strictly reactive, depending on incoming economic data. This is a critical shift in the Fed's reaction function that changes the calculus for predicting future moves.

Alan Greenspan viewed a rising gold price as a market signal that monetary policy was too loose and interest rates were too low. Today's soaring gold price, viewed through this lens, suggests the Federal Reserve is making a significant policy error by considering rate cuts.

The official NBER designation of a recession is less critical for commodity performance than the surrounding macro environment. For instance, the 1998 currency crisis crushed returns without a formal recession, while Chinese stimulus in 2008 caused a commodity melt-up during the GFC.

Commodity Returns Depend on the Nature of a Fed Rate-Cutting Cycle, Not Just the Cuts Themselves | RiffOn