Since the IMF's most critical decisions require an 85% supermajority vote, the United States' 17% quota share effectively grants it veto power. No major strategic decision can pass without U.S. approval, cementing its central role in global financial governance.

Related Insights

The US dollar's dominance is less about its role in oil transactions (petrodollar) and more about its deep integration into global banking and financial plumbing via the Eurodollar system. This structural entrenchment makes it incredibly difficult to displace.

Paradoxically, the rise in global geopolitical friction has spurred a greater desire for cooperation within the IMF. The managing director observes that member nations no longer take collaboration for granted, leading to more mature and willing discussions inside the institution as an 'island of cooperation'.

While a unipolar world led by one's own country is advantageous, a multipolar world with competing powers like the U.S. and China creates a dynamic tension. This competition may force more compromised global decisions, potentially leading to a more balanced, albeit more tense, international system than one dominated by a single unchallenged power.

The primary risk for the U.S. is not the inevitable decline of the dollar's dominance, which could rebalance the economy. The danger lies in trying to fight this trend, leading to a disorderly and painful collapse rather than a graceful, managed transition from a position of strength.

Officials at IMF meetings expressed surprise at how little the Trump administration has focused on foreign exchange rates. There is a growing expectation that this could change next year, with a renewed focus on the dollar if the US trade deficit fails to normalize, creating a latent political risk.

For decades, a tacit global agreement existed: the U.S. buys the world's goods and provides security, and in return, the world finances U.S. debt by buying Treasuries. As U.S. policy shifts towards protectionism and reduced global policing, other nations may no longer feel obligated to fund U.S. deficits, pushing borrowing costs higher.

As part of its equity deal with Intel, the U.S. government has agreed to vote its 9.9% stake according to the board's recommendations. This arrangement effectively hands the board a powerful, stable voting bloc, insulating management from shareholder activism and reinforcing the existing power structure.

A nation’s currency becomes dominant long after its economic and military power is established. Similarly, it retains that status due to network effects long after other metrics of power have begun to decline. The dollar's persistence is an example of this lagging effect.

The U.S. government is actively promoting stablecoins and U.S.-based AI to extend its global influence. This strategy shifts from projecting power through military presence to technological and financial dominance, ensuring the dollar and American culture remain central to the global system.

The IMF and World Bank have distinct roles. The IMF provides emergency financing for macroeconomic stability when a country faces a crisis (e.g., balance of payment needs). In contrast, the World Bank funds specific, long-term development projects like roads, schools, and energy access, primarily in developing nations.