We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
When discussing the downsides of a DIY approach, move beyond typical cost-benefit analysis. Highlight less obvious but critical risks, such as losing employee confidence with a failed internal rollout or the unforeseen complexity and delays caused by needing buy-in from privacy, compliance, and IT departments.
Despite proven cost efficiencies from deploying fine-tuned AI models, companies report the primary barrier to adoption is human, not technical. The core challenge is overcoming employee inertia and successfully integrating new tools into existing workflows—a classic change management problem.
Gaining consensus in a large government agency can be harder than building the product itself. The IRS Direct File team smartly launched their e-filing system to IRS employees first, using the product as a tool to build internal support before a public rollout.
Instead of promising a flawless implementation, build trust by telling prospects where issues commonly arise and what your process is to mitigate them. Acknowledging potential bumps in the road shows you have experience and a realistic plan, making you a more credible partner than a salesperson who promises perfection.
Companies often underestimate the total cost of building internal tools. Beyond initial development, they must commit to ongoing product management functions like enablement, documentation, iteration, and maintenance. This hidden workload can become a significant resource drain if not planned for.
When highlighting the downsides of building in-house, avoid directly telling the prospect they will fail. Instead, frame potential pitfalls as lessons learned from other, similar companies ("One CMO I worked with found..."). This makes you a helpful advisor sharing industry wisdom, not a confrontational salesperson.
Companies fail to generate AI ROI not because the technology is inadequate, but because they neglect the human element. Resistance, fear, and lack of buy-in must be addressed through empathetic change management and education.
To persuade risk-averse leaders to approve unconventional AI initiatives, shift the focus from the potential upside to the tangible risks of standing still. Paint a clear picture of the competitive disadvantages and missed opportunities the company will face by failing to act.
Employees hesitate to use new AI tools for fear of looking foolish or getting fired for misuse. Successful adoption depends less on training courses and more on creating a safe environment with clear guardrails that encourages experimentation without penalty.
After a prospect decides to build in-house, don't fight them. Instead, offer genuine advice on how they can succeed, such as tips on resource allocation or success metrics. This counterintuitive move builds massive trust, lowers their defenses, and makes them more receptive to hearing the potential pitfalls later.
Despite developing frontier AI models, Google itself faces challenges getting its non-technical employees to adopt the technology. This highlights that access to tools is not enough; overcoming internal adoption hurdles is a universal problem, even for the companies building the AI.