History shows marketers often ruin new channels (email, SMS) by overwhelming them with low-quality 'spam.' The immediate push to monetize the agent channel could create a similar 'arms race' of spam-bots and anti-spam agents, eroding consumer trust and killing the channel's potential.
Related Insights
OpenAI faced significant user backlash for testing app suggestions that looked like ads in its paid ChatGPT Pro plan. This reaction shows that users of premium AI tools expect an ad-free, utility-focused experience. Violating this expectation, even unintentionally, risks alienating the core user base and damaging brand trust.
The massive increase in low-quality, AI-generated prospecting emails has conditioned buyers to ignore all outreach, even legitimate, personalized messages. This volume has eroded the efficiency gains the technology promised, making it harder for everyone to break through.
A new marketing tactic involves creating high-quality, AI-generated content on platforms like Reddit to promote a product. The goal is to have this seemingly authentic user content indexed and then surfaced by LLMs like ChatGPT in their summaries, creating an insidious and hard-to-detect marketing channel.
Outbound AI tools fail without dedicated human oversight. Qualified found success by having a person manage the AI agent daily, ensuring its personalized emails are better than a human's. The secret is treating the AI as a tool to be managed, not an autonomous replacement.
For an AI chatbot to successfully monetize with ads, it must never integrate paid placements directly into its objective answers. Crossing this 'bright red line' would destroy consumer trust, as users would question whether they are receiving the most relevant information or simply the information from the highest bidder.
For years, businesses have focused on protecting their sites from malicious bots. This same architecture now blocks beneficial AI agents acting on behalf of consumers. Companies must rethink their technical infrastructure to differentiate and welcome these new 'good bots' for agentic commerce.
During BFCM, consumer inboxes are flooded. To break through, brands should send multiple emails per day, including resends (e.g., 3 scheduled emails plus a resend for each). The incremental revenue gained from this high frequency justifies the potential increase in spam complaints.
AI makes it easy to generate grammatically correct but generic outreach. This flood of 'mediocre' communication, rather than 'terrible' spam, makes it harder for genuine, well-researched messages to stand out. Success now requires a level of personalization that generic AI can't fake.
'Do not reply' isn't just poor CX; it's a strategic failure. It represents 'deliberate blindness,' blocking the high-fidelity customer data needed to train AI models. This tells customers you want their money but not their voice, creating a 'brand debt' that catastrophically erodes trust.
The most significant error when approaching conversational AI is not a specific tactical mistake, but a lack of action. Delaying entry into this new channel is more damaging than launching an imperfect campaign, as action creates the data needed for iteration and learning, which provides a competitive advantage.
