We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Counteract pushback on aesthetics by framing them not as subjective preference but as strategic business decisions. Connect specific forms, colors, and textures back to the company's Visual Brand Language (VBL), showing how they reinforce the desired customer perception and brand identity. It's not personal taste; it's a business choice.
A well-developed brand with distinct colors, fonts, mascots, or taglines gives marketers tangible assets to build creative campaigns around. This makes marketing smoother and more effective, avoiding the difficulty of promoting a generic or "plain" company identity.
Instead of justifying brand building as a defense against AI-driven commoditization, frame it as an offensive move that builds long-term value. A strong brand shortens sales cycles and increases customer lifetime value, directly impacting revenue and making it a proactive investment that resonates with CEOs and CFOs.
Stakeholders respond to the language of business impact. Instead of pitching an initiative to "improve the onboarding experience," frame it as a way to "grow our business customers in this sector." This small change in communication connects your work directly to the goals stakeholders care about.
The company's design leadership is pushing back against justifying design solely through business metrics, arguing it signals a lack of confidence in craft. They foster a culture where the primary measure of success is the team's own high bar for taste, trusting this will ultimately drive long-term value.
When brand teams resist testing simpler, text-based emails, don't argue about aesthetics. Frame the proposal around business value: reduced design and QA time, and the potential for higher conversion rates. Quantify the impact on efficiency and revenue to get buy-in.
A rebrand's foundation isn't visual; it's defining the company's "soul"—its purpose, voice, and personality. This creates brand principles (e.g., "be undaunted but thoughtful") that serve as the objective standard for evaluating all creative choices, from the name to the logo.
Before starting a project, define its intended feel with key adjectives (e.g., "techie," "classical," "sharp"). This vision becomes a powerful filter, helping you make consistent decisions and resist the temptation to chase trends or get discouraged by other designers' work.
Most companies complete the first 80% of brand work (logo, colors, tagline). Truly great brands are defined by the last 20%: obsessively aligning every detail, from employee headphones to event swag, with the core identity. This final polish is what customers actually notice and remember.
True brand consistency isn't about making everything identical. Like siblings who share family traits but look different, brand executions should be 'consistently inconsistent.' They must clearly originate from the same brand DNA (the design system and archetype) but can be expressed in varied, non-repetitive ways.
To get a CEO fully invested, position the rebrand not as a marketing initiative but as foundational infrastructure that touches every part of the business, from HR and recruiting to sales and customer operations. This reframing elevates its importance and ensures cross-departmental adoption.