The indie hacking and solopreneur movements often become a dogmatic 'cult' that's simply a reaction against the 'pro-VC cult.' There is nothing inherently wrong with having a team, working in person, or getting acquired. Adhering strictly to a 'solo' or 'bootstrapped' ethos can be just as limiting as blindly following the venture-backed path.

Related Insights

The perception of a single individual producing a high volume of quality content is often a myth. Behind the scenes, a dedicated team handles research, idea generation, drafting, and editing. True scale and greatness in content creation are achieved through leveraging the "agency of others."

The most significant founder mistakes often arise from abandoning one's own judgment to do what is conventionally expected. Jason Fried notes that these errors feel worse because you aren't just failing, you're failing while trying to be someone else, which undermines the core identity of your company.

True entrepreneurship often stems from a 'compulsion' to solve a problem, rather than a conscious decision to adopt a job title. This internal drive is what fuels founders through the difficult decisions, particularly when forced to choose between short-term financial engineering and long-term adherence to a mission of creating real value.

Co-founding a business is often harder than a marriage, yet receives far less diligence. The probability of two individuals maintaining perfect alignment on effort, finances, and vision over many years is incredibly low, making solo ventures statistically safer.

Club Penguin's co-founder warns that accepting VC money creates immense pressure to become a billion-dollar company. This often crushes otherwise successful businesses that could have been profitable at a smaller scale, making founders worse off in the long run.

Founders often start scrappy out of necessity and dream of lavish resources. However, once successful, many realize that small, lean, and scrappy teams are more effective. This creates a paradox where the most successful entrepreneurs intentionally revert to the resource-constrained mindset they once tried to escape.

Instead of chasing trends or pivoting every few weeks, founders should focus on a singular mission that stems from their unique expertise and conviction. This approach builds durable, meaningful companies rather than simply chasing valuations.

The dominant VC narrative demands founders focus on a single venture. However, successful entrepreneurs demonstrate that running multiple projects—a portfolio approach mirrored by VCs themselves—is a viable path, contrary to the "focus on one thing" dogma.

The Laundress founder argues that celebrating multiple VC rounds is misguided. While seen as a "badge of honor," it means giving away control and equity. By bootstrapping, she retained majority ownership, contrasting the "sexy" VC narrative with the financial reality of keeping your company.

A successful entrepreneur who built her business on her personal brand now cautions against it being the only viable strategy. She admits she was wrong and now advocates for building businesses not tied to one's name and likeness, stressing the need to separate the human from the brand.

The "Indie Hacking" Movement Can Be a Reactive Cult, Not an Inherently Better Path | RiffOn