Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The growing gap between company productivity and employee wages isn't solely due to corporate greed. The ability to outsource work globally gives companies immense leverage, weakening the negotiating power of domestic workers and suppressing their wages.

Related Insights

The decline in U.S. manufacturing isn't just about labor costs. A crucial, overlooked factor is the disparity in savings. While Americans consumed, nations like China saved and invested in capital goods like factories, making their labor more productive and thus more attractive for manufacturing investment.

The significant gap between CEO and worker pay is a direct result of globalization. When companies can easily outsource labor, domestic workers lose their negotiating power, or "fear of loss." This allows capital owners and executives to capture a larger share of the value created, widening the income disparity.

Despite a 52-year explosion in technology and worker productivity, the average American worker's real weekly wages, adjusted for inflation, are lower today than in 1973. This highlights a fundamental failure of the economic system to distribute gains from innovation to labor.

Wage stagnation is not accidental but a result of two concurrent policies. By sending manufacturing jobs overseas and simultaneously bringing in low-wage labor, corporations create a market where domestic workers lose nearly all leverage to demand higher pay for remaining jobs.

Raising the minimum wage is a superficial fix for stagnant wages. True wage growth comes from two systemic factors: an education system that prioritizes valuable skill acquisition, and deglobalization, which prevents skilled domestic workers from being easily replaced by cheaper foreign labor.

Large-scale immigration programs, such as those for international students and temporary foreign workers, can be abused by multinational corporations. These companies use the programs to hire workers with fewer rights at artificially low wages, which drives down overall wages and displaces the domestic workforce.

Helping the middle class is a matter of economic physics, not emotional appeals. The most effective strategy is to create a labor market where there are more jobs than workers. This is achieved by re-shoring manufacturing and controlling the influx of cheap labor, which gives domestic workers the leverage to command higher wages.

By shipping millions of jobs overseas, globalism forced American workers to compete with a much larger, cheaper international labor pool. This eliminated employers' need to compete for a finite domestic workforce, leading to wage stagnation. The proposed solution is to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.

The US is seeing solid GDP growth without a corresponding tightening in the labor market. This isn't due to economic weakness, but a significant rise in productivity (from 1.5% to over 2%) which allows the economy to expand faster without needing more workers, driving a wedge between GDP and job growth.

The belief that innovation can happen in one country while production happens in another is a fundamental error. True, rapid innovation is a consequence of the tight feedback loops created when R&D engineers are co-located on the production floor. Outsourcing manufacturing inevitably leads to outsourcing innovation.