Goldman Sachs Wealth Management questions China's official ~5% GDP growth, citing respected third-party analysis from firms like the Rhodium Group suggesting real growth is closer to 1-3%. This fundamental skepticism underpins their cautious stance on Chinese equities, despite recent market rallies.
Related Insights
While Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measures economic output via spending, Gross Domestic Income (GDI) measures it via income. The significant gap between the two in Q3 suggests the economy's underlying strength is weaker than the headline number indicates, as an average of the two is often more accurate.
Independent research firm Rhodium Group argues China's official GDP data is unrealistically stable and overstates growth. By analyzing expenditure-side components, they estimate recent growth has averaged closer to 2-3%, reflecting the severe property sector collapse.
Beijing's political commitment to annual growth targets prevents it from allowing the economy to slow down and rebalance. Instead of fostering sustainable consumption, it must constantly stimulate investment and exports, perpetuating the very imbalances that threaten long-term stability.
Traditional analysis links real GDP growth to corporate profits. However, in an inflationary period, strong nominal growth can flow directly to revenues and boost profits even if real output contracts, especially if wage growth lags. This makes nominal figures a better indicator for equity markets.
The idea of China's economy inevitably surpassing the U.S. is no longer plausible. China peaked at 18.5% of global GDP in 2021 and has since declined. The systemic economic competition with the U.S. is "basically over."
China reports 5% real GDP growth while experiencing persistent deflation. This is historically unprecedented for an investment-led economy, with the only possible parallel being the 19th-century U.S. The inconsistency suggests official growth numbers are not credible.
China's economic success is driven by a small, hyper-competitive private sector (the top 5%). This masks a much larger, dysfunctional morass of state-owned enterprises, leading to declining overall capital productivity despite headline-grabbing advances.
Following a 30-40% valuation surge in 2025, China's market is expected to stabilize. Further upside in 2026 will depend on corporate earnings, projected at a modest 6%, signaling a shift from a valuation-driven to an earnings-driven market that requires a different investment approach.
While China's high-tech manufacturing output soars (up 9.4%), retail sales lag significantly (up only 3.7%). This stark divergence reveals a fundamentally imbalanced economy that excels at production but fails to distribute wealth to its citizens, suppressing domestic demand and risking a future crash.
Despite rhetoric about shifting to a consumption-led economy, China's rigid annual GDP growth targets make this impossible. This political necessity forces a constant return to state-driven fixed asset investment to hit the numbers. The result is a "cha-cha" of economic policy—one step toward rebalancing, two steps back toward the old model—making any true shift short-lived.
