There's a profound disconnect in the U.S. between the perceived need for more manufacturing and the actual desire to work in that sector. While 80% of Americans believe the country needs more manufacturing, only 20% would want a manufacturing job themselves, highlighting a cultural preference for white-collar or service-based work.
Related Insights
A return to the 1990s boom in mass-produced furniture is unrealistic. The future of the American industry lies in smaller, efficient factories with high-skilled workers trained in areas like computer-assisted design, focusing on high-end, custom pieces.
Bringing manufacturing back to the US won't mean a return of old assembly line jobs. The real opportunity is to leapfrog to automated factories that produce sophisticated, tech-infused products. This creates a new class of higher-skill, higher-pay "blue collar plus" jobs focused on building and maintaining these advanced manufacturing systems.
Technological advancement creates a paradox: as machines automate more tasks, the economic value of uniquely human and social interaction increases. This structural shift helps explain why recent job growth is so concentrated in sectors like health, education, and hospitality.
Despite tariffs making imports more expensive, moving furniture production back to the US is seen as unrealistic. The primary obstacle is not financial, but a critical shortage of trained workers who can and want to do the work, a deficit that tariffs cannot fix.
Arm's CEO argues the US has lost its 'muscle memory' for 24/7 manufacturing. The core issue is cultural: manufacturing isn't seen as a prestigious career, unlike in Taiwan where working for TSMC is highly esteemed. This cultural gap is a major hurdle for onshoring efforts.
Instead of trying to reclaim low-cost assembly jobs, the U.S. should leapfrog to advanced manufacturing for complex future products like robots and electric vehicles. This strategy creates a new category of higher-skill, higher-paying "blue collar plus" jobs that are more resilient to offshoring.
AI is rapidly automating knowledge work, making white-collar jobs precarious. In contrast, physical trades requiring dexterity and on-site problem-solving (e.g., plumbing, painting) are much harder to automate. This will increase the value and demand for skilled blue-collar professionals.
Ford's CEO highlights a national crisis: a severe shortage of essential blue-collar workers like technicians and construction workers. He argues society overvalues white-collar paths and must reinvest in trade schools and restore the dignity of these critical, well-paying jobs.
US policy fetishizes a return to manufacturing, which employs 11% of the workforce. However, protectionist policies like tariffs actively harm the higher-margin, larger tourism industry, which employs 12%. This represents a sclerotic and irrational trade-off that damages a more valuable sector of the economy.
Contrary to political rhetoric, Siemens' CEO provides a ground-level view that a widespread return of manufacturing to the US has not yet materialized. He cites labor shortages and policy uncertainty as key drags, despite real investments in specific sectors like pharma and semiconductors.
