When a target company's value lies in a few key people and their relationships, it can be more capital-efficient to 'pillage' that talent with massive signing bonuses rather than acquiring the entire business for a much higher valuation. This is a pure capital allocation play.

Related Insights

Counterintuitively, paying employees significantly more than the market rate can be more profitable. It attracts A-players and changes the dynamic from a zero-sum negotiation to a collaborative effort to grow the entire business. This fosters better relationships and disproportionately larger outcomes where everyone wins.

A unique "Double and Keep It" model helps business owners double their company's value by using external capital from family offices to acquire other companies. This creates a larger, more attractive group for a future sale, increasing the owner's payout without them taking equity dilution or adding debt to their original business.

Capital allocation isn't just about multi-million dollar acquisitions. Hiring a single employee is also a major investment; a $100k salary represents a discounted million-dollar commitment over time. Applying the same rigor to hiring decisions as you would to CapEx ensures you're investing your human capital wisely.

Paying billions for talent via acquihires or massive compensation packages is a logical business decision in the AI era. When a company is spending tens of billions on CapEx, securing the handful of elite engineers who can maximize that investment's ROI is a justifiable and necessary expense.

Large companies rarely make cold acquisition offers. The typical path is a gradual process starting with a partnership or a small investment. This allows the acquirer to conduct due diligence from the inside, understand the startup's value, and build relationships before escalating to a full buyout.

Counter to the adage that "startups shouldn't buy startups," Cursor successfully uses M&A as a core recruiting strategy. They acquire small, talented teams working on complementary problems, viewing acquisitions as a way to onboard the best people who happen to already be working on their own companies.

Rather than competing in crowded auctions, elite private equity firms pursue a differentiated "executive new build" strategy. They partner with proven operators to build new companies from scratch to address a market need, creating proprietary deals that other firms cannot access.

In a competitive M&A process where the target is reluctant, a marginal price increase may not work. A winning strategy can be to 'overpay' significantly. This makes the offer financially indefensible for the board to reject and immediately ends the bidding process, guaranteeing the acquisition.

Due diligence cannot quantify a team's crucial soft skills. When an acquirer forces change aggressively post-close, they risk an exodus of these skills and key talent, maximizing the chance of the investment failing. A partnership approach that preserves talent for at least the first year is a much safer strategy.

When acquiring a business, don't rely on a single outcome like achieving a growth target. Instead, seek assets that offer multiple ways to win. Even if the primary goal is missed, the acquired data, technology, or talent could create significant value for other business units, providing built-in insurance for the deal.