Instead of allocating a large sum to a low-volatility alternative, investors should allocate a smaller amount to a higher-volatility version of the same strategy. This provides the same dollar exposure to the alpha source but is more capital-efficient, freeing up capital for other uses and reducing manager risk.
Related Insights
The new approach to asset allocation treats private markets as an alternative to public stocks and bonds, not just a small add-on. This means integrating them directly into the core equity and debt portions of a portfolio to enhance returns and diversification.
For moderate-risk, ultra-high-net-worth clients, Goldman Sachs advocates a surprisingly high 27% portfolio allocation to alternatives. The main challenge is implementation, so the firm uses proprietary "commitment planners" to help clients methodically invest capital annually, ensuring diversification across vintage years, strategies, and managers.
Instead of making large initial bets, a more effective strategy is to take small, "junior varsity" positions. Investors then aggressively ramp up their size only when the thesis begins to demonstrably play out, a method described as "high conviction, inflection investing."
A portfolio's performance can be dramatically enhanced by combining traditionally separate strategies. A leveraged mix of equities (S&P), hedges (long volatility), and trend-following strategies can produce returns that are multiples higher (e.g., 40x) than equities alone (e.g., 6-7x) over the same period.
Allocate more capital to businesses with a highly predictable future (a narrow "cone of uncertainty"), like Costco. Less predictable, high-upside bets should be smaller positions, as their future has a wider range of possible outcomes. Conviction and certainty should drive allocation size.
When a small, speculative investment like crypto appreciates massively, it can unbalance an entire portfolio by becoming an oversized allocation. This 'good problem' forces investors to systematically sell the high-performing asset to manage risk, even as it continues to grow.
Successful investing isn't about being right all the time; it's about making your wins exponentially larger than your losses. Top investors like Paul Tudor Jones only enter trades where the potential reward is at least five times the risk, allowing them to be wrong often and still profit.
The highest risk-adjusted return comes from amplifying what already works. The likelihood of a new marketing channel or sales script succeeding is statistically low. Instead of rolling the dice on something new, you should allocate resources to dramatically increase the volume of your proven winners.
The relationship between risk and reward in investment portfolios has shifted. The efficient frontier—the best possible return for a given level of risk—is now lower and flatter. This structural change means that simply adding more risk to a portfolio will not boost returns as significantly as it has in the past.
A 50% portfolio loss requires a 100% gain just to break even. The wealthy use low-volatility strategies to protect against massive downturns. By experiencing smaller losses (e.g., -10% vs. -40%), their portfolios recover faster and compound more effectively over the long term.
