We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
The internet's targeted ad model wasn't a radical invention but an extension of a post-WWII societal shift. The American economy had already prioritized the "consumer" over the "citizen," creating a public primed to be analyzed and sold to, rather than engaged in civic discourse.
The "Resist and Unsubscribe" movement is based on the premise that withdrawing economic participation is the most powerful form of protest in a market-driven society. It's a low-effort way for citizens to exert influence, as markets respond more crisply to shifts in consumer behavior than to ideological arguments.
The promise that technology—from personal computers to the internet to social media—will democratize society is a recurring ad campaign. While new tech offers democratizing potential, powerful actors and existing structures consistently adapt to re-centralize control and consolidate power.
Platforms follow a predictable cycle called 'inshittification.' First, they offer a great user experience to achieve scale. Next, they squeeze users to benefit advertisers. Finally, they squeeze advertisers to maximize their own profits. This model explains why platforms inevitably prioritize profit over user well-being and safety.
Unlike historical propaganda which used centralized broadcasts, today's narrative control is decentralized and subtle. It operates through billions of micro-decisions and algorithmic nudges that shape individual perceptions daily, achieving macro-level control without any overt displays of power.
As early as 1968, thinkers forecasted that personalized news streams would make representative government impossible. They argued that atomized information would destroy the shared sense of community interest that is foundational to party politics and democratic deliberation.
Social platforms are declining as places for genuine connection, shifting to AI-generated 'slop' and content from strangers. Their business model remains viable not by improving the user's social experience, but by using AI to become so effective at ad targeting that even mindless engagement is highly monetizable.
Marketers in the attention economy leverage fear and insecurity to sell products. As author David Foster Wallace noted, ads are designed to "create an anxiety relievable by purchase." This tactic contributes to a baseline of societal anxiety for the banal reason of driving consumerism.
Tech platforms consistently outperform publishers in advertising because their proprietary data is fundamentally better. They possess an extraordinary depth of behavioral information, such as 'four finger scrolling speed,' which allows for predictive targeting that the fragmented open web cannot replicate. This data advantage is the core driver of their market dominance.
A huge portion of the market, dominated by social media and AI companies, connects shareholder value directly to enragement and isolation. Algorithms are designed to sequester users and serve them content that confirms biases or angers them, keeping them engaged.
The "artificial state" succeeds the nation-state as private corporations seize control of public discourse. These companies prioritize monetizing attention and outrage over free expression and democratic deliberation, effectively supplanting a core function of democracy.