Javier Malé's midterm victory gives him enough congressional seats to block opposition spending but not enough to pass his own ambitious reforms. His success now hinges on building coalitions, a skill that contrasts with his populist, anti-establishment persona and represents a critical pivot from campaigning to governing.
Related Insights
The U.S. Treasury's purchase of $2 billion in Argentine pesos before the election was more than a currency stabilization effort; it was a strategic political endorsement of President Malé that paid off. The move provided crucial support and, with the peso strengthening post-election, could even turn a profit for the U.S.
Unprecedented US financial support, likened to Draghi's "whatever it takes," has successfully created a circuit breaker for Argentina's negative market feedback loop. However, this support only addresses financial symptoms (FX and credit risk) and cannot solve the underlying political uncertainty about the government's ability to implement reforms.
The recent $20 billion U.S. Treasury support for Argentina was not a reactive bailout for a failing program. It was a pre-planned "big bazooka" to counter a politically-motivated speculative attack on the peso ahead of midterm elections, making it prohibitively expensive to bet against the country's stability.
Given the unreliability of polling, markets will wait for tangible results before reacting. The composition of congress will be the first concrete signal, with a divided or right-leaning legislature seen as a positive check on executive power. This could trigger currency rallies well before the final presidential outcome is known.
The appeal of a populist leader lies in their rejection of traditional political norms. When the electorate feels betrayed by the established "political class," they gravitate toward figures whose rhetoric is a deliberate and stark contrast, signaling they are an outsider.
When a political movement is out of power, it's easy to unify against a common opponent. Once they gain power and become the establishment, internal disagreements surface, leading to factions and infighting as they debate the group's future direction.
Argentina's President Javier Milei uses a chainsaw at rallies not just for shock value, but as a potent symbol. It simultaneously represents the problem (excessive government spending) and his proposed solution (slashing the budget), creating a simple and resonant message for voters weary of economic jargon.
Despite Javier Milei's iconoclastic image, his economic program is run by a highly respected, conventional team of technocrats, many from the previous reformist administration. This creates a separation between his "Trumpy" political style and the orthodox, IMF-style stabilization policies being implemented.
Knowing they would perform well in Buenos Aires, the Peronist party strategically held an early local election. They correctly anticipated President Milei would over-promise on his party's performance, creating a negative market reaction when he under-delivered, thereby executing a "perfectly executed attack" on his program's stability.
The conventional wisdom that moderate candidates are more electable is a myth. Elections are won by turnout, not by appealing to the median voter. A polarizing figure who excites their base will often win by a larger margin than a moderate who fails to generate enthusiasm.
