Politicians predictably declare initiatives for domestic production of critical goods like munitions or rare earths when dependencies are exposed. However, these declarations rarely translate into effective action, suggesting we must learn to manage economic entanglement as a form of mutual deterrence rather than wish it away.

China's export ban on rare earth metals, critical for everything from iPhones to fighter jets, exposes a major US vulnerability. The solution is to treat domestic mining like vaccine development—a national security priority that requires fast-tracking the typical 30-year regulatory process for opening new mines.

Western leaders mistakenly focus on securing raw material sources ('feedstock'), believing mining rights equal supply chain control. The reality is that China's dominance in midstream processing makes the mine's location irrelevant, as they control the ability to turn ore into usable material.

While headlines focus on advanced chips, China’s real leverage comes from its strategic control over less glamorous but essential upstream inputs like rare earths and magnets. It has even banned the export of magnet-making technology, creating critical, hard-to-solve bottlenecks for Western manufacturing.

For 20 years, pension funds and endowments shunned investment in mining and resources due to political and social pressures. Now, a confluence of geopolitical necessity and reshoring is creating a demand shock that institutional capital is unprepared for, forcing them to chase a supply-constrained sector and exacerbating the rally.

Facing China's export restrictions on rare earth metals, the U.S. immediate strategy is "ally-shoring": striking a major deal with Australia. This secures the supply chain through geopolitical partnerships as a faster, more pragmatic alternative to the long process of building domestic capacity from scratch.

China is restricting exports of essential rare earth minerals and EV battery manufacturing equipment. This is a strategic move to protect its global dominance in these critical industries, leveraging the fact that other countries have outsourced environmentally harmful mining to them for decades.

Companies offshore production because it's cheaper. Forcing manufacturing back to the US via policy results in more expensive or lower-quality goods. While it improves supply chain resilience, this should be viewed as an insurance premium—a cost, not a productive investment.

China's global dominance isn't in owning mines, but in controlling the midstream refining and smelting processes. This creates a critical choke point for the West's supply of essential materials for defense, AI, and electrification, as they control 50-98% of processing capacity for key metals.