Western leaders mistakenly focus on securing raw material sources ('feedstock'), believing mining rights equal supply chain control. The reality is that China's dominance in midstream processing makes the mine's location irrelevant, as they control the ability to turn ore into usable material.
Related Insights
The strategic competition with China is often viewed through a high-tech military lens, but its true power lies in dominating the low-tech supply chain. China can cripple other economies by simply withholding basic components like nuts, bolts, and screws, proving that industrial basics are a key geopolitical weapon.
China is leveraging its 90% control over rare earth processing not just against the US, but globally. By requiring licenses from any company worldwide, it creates a chokehold on high-tech manufacturing and establishes a new template for economic coercion.
China employs "weaponized pricing" by offering refining services at a negative cost, effectively paying countries to process their copper. This tactic makes it impossible for Western refiners to compete, ensuring China maintains its stranglehold on the critical midstream supply chain.
Following US policy moves, China is likely to expand its use of export controls on critical materials. Silver, essential for EVs, solar panels, and AI data centers, has been added to its list, signaling a willingness to leverage its supply chain dominance as a geopolitical tool against rivals.
While headlines focus on advanced chips, China’s real leverage comes from its strategic control over less glamorous but essential upstream inputs like rare earths and magnets. It has even banned the export of magnet-making technology, creating critical, hard-to-solve bottlenecks for Western manufacturing.
China achieved its near-monopoly on rare earths not by chance, but through a long-term state-sponsored strategy. This involved providing capital to key firms, funding overseas acquisitions, banning foreign ownership of domestic mines, and consolidating the industry to control global prices.
China is restricting exports of essential rare earth minerals and EV battery manufacturing equipment. This is a strategic move to protect its global dominance in these critical industries, leveraging the fact that other countries have outsourced environmentally harmful mining to them for decades.
China's global dominance isn't in owning mines, but in controlling the midstream refining and smelting processes. This creates a critical choke point for the West's supply of essential materials for defense, AI, and electrification, as they control 50-98% of processing capacity for key metals.
The current geopolitical shift toward resource nationalism is focused on critical metals and minerals, not oil. The crude market is relatively well-supplied by producers like the U.S. and potentially Venezuela, making the 'death of globalism' primarily a story about securing supply chains for industrial and technological metals.
Beyond raw materials, China's national ambition is to achieve near-total self-sufficiency. The prevailing mood is that there is "nothing for which it wants to rely on foreigners a single day longer than it has to." This philosophy of aggressive import substitution signals a fundamental break with the logic of reciprocal global trade.
