Chipotle CBO Chris Brandt filters candidates based on a simple, visceral question: 'Would you be willing to walk into a conference room with them at 5 PM on a Friday?' This test prioritizes collaborative spirit and cultural fit over pure skill, ensuring new hires won't disrupt team dynamics, even if they look good on paper.

Treat interviews as evidence-gathering sessions, not snap judgments. Ask broad questions like 'How did you grow your product?' and listen for signals of desired traits. Use a scorecard with concrete examples to assess candidates against criteria like being data-driven, thereby reducing personal bias.

Exceptional individuals often publish their thoughts online. By reading their content, you can assess their thinking, expertise, and confluence of ideas, making a traditional interview redundant. This allows you to move decisively when you find a match, as when the speaker hired his Opendoor cofounder on the spot.

In a complex field like ad tech, curiosity is as critical as experience. Interviewers should assess this by seeing if candidates drive the conversation with insightful questions. A lack of curiosity is a major red flag, suggesting they won't thrive in a dynamic environment.

A common hiring mistake is prioritizing a conversational 'vibe check' over assessing actual skills. A much better approach is to give candidates a project that simulates the job's core responsibilities, providing a direct and clean signal of their capabilities.

For leadership roles, the interview itself is a critical test. If the candidate isn't teaching you something new about their function, it's a red flag. A true leader should bring expertise that elevates your understanding. If you have to teach them, they will consume your time rather than create leverage.

Ditch standard FANG interview questions. Instead, ask candidates to describe a messy but valuable project they shipped. The best candidates will tell an authentic, automatic story with personal anecdotes. Their fluency and detail reveal true experience, whereas hesitation or generic answers expose a lack of depth.

For high-level leadership roles, skip hypothetical case studies. Instead, present candidates with your company's actual, current problems. The worst-case scenario is free, high-quality consulting. The best case is finding someone who can not only devise a solution but also implement it, making the interview process far more valuable.

Ineffective interviews try to catch candidates failing. A better approach models a collaborative rally: see how they handle challenging questions and if they can return the ball effectively. The goal is to simulate real-world problem-solving, not just grill them under pressure.