Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Instead of focusing on lagging indicators like revenue, GPs and LPs should review portfolios by asking what key uncertainties (market, product, tech) have been resolved. This provides a more accurate leading indicator of a company's progress and potential.

Related Insights

Most turnarounds fail. Instead of investing on the announcement, wait 12-24 months for early evidence in leading KPIs before they hit the bottom line. This improves your odds, as turnarounds that start working rarely revert. The probability gain is worth more than the initial upside you miss.

To predict a project's success, move beyond lagging indicators like schedule and budget. Instead, monitor leading indicators like the rate and "stickiness" of decisions, the stability of interfaces between subsystems, and how proactively risks are surfaced and addressed. These day-to-day factors determine the ultimate outcome.

Effective due diligence isn't a checklist, but the collection of many small data points—revenue, team retention, customer love, CVC interest. A strong investment is a "beam" where all points align positively. Any misalignment creates doubt and likely signals a "no," adhering to the "if it's not a hell yes, it's a no" rule.

Evaluating a single month's pipeline or bookings provides a misleading snapshot. True insight comes from analyzing the progression of key metrics over several quarters to understand if the business is improving or declining. Historical context reveals the real story behind the numbers.

When assessing a company, it's critical to distinguish between its current revenue results and the sustainability of its revenue engine. The ultimate asset a PE firm sells is a scalable, founder-independent growth engine, not just a track record of founder-driven sales.

Shift focus from 'value' (a lagging indicator like profit) to 'utility' (a leading indicator of your team's capability). This fosters a proactive, "glass half full" perspective on what the organization can accomplish, rather than fixating on past results.

Portfolio reviews typically analyze data that is weeks or months old, making them passive and backward-looking. The future of portfolio management requires real-time data to enable proactive decisions and on-the-spot re-underwriting.

Venture capital returns materialize over a decade, making short-term outputs like markups unreliable 'mirages.' Sequoia instead measures partners on tangible inputs. They are reviewed semi-annually on the quality of their decision-making process (e.g., investment memos) and their adherence to core team values, not on premature financial metrics.

Revenue is a lagging indicator and is too slow for validating major strategic shifts. To get an early signal, establish checkpoints using leading indicators. For a decision aimed at acquiring more customers, track metrics like sales team win rates on a monthly basis to see if the hypothesis is proving correct before revenue numbers reflect the change.

To manage performance despite long feedback cycles, Greylock developed an "inputs-based" model. They assess partners on 18 specific actions, like seeing 75% of competitive deals, believing that consistently strong inputs are the best predictor of long-term success.

Reframe Portfolio Reviews to Track Resolved Uncertainties, Not Just Revenue | RiffOn