To avoid becoming an "ivory tower" manager, engineering leaders should use side projects as a playground for new technologies. This practice ensures they understand the limitations of new tools like AI and can provide credible, concrete, hands-on guidance to their teams.
To prepare for a future of human-AI collaboration, technology adoption is not enough. Leaders must actively build AI fluency within their teams by personally engaging with the tools. This hands-on approach models curiosity and confidence, creating a culture where it's safe to experiment, learn, and even fail with new technology.
Simply instructing engineers to "build AI" is ineffective. Leaders must develop hands-on proficiency with no-code tools to understand AI's capabilities and limitations. This direct experience provides the necessary context to guide technical teams, make bolder decisions, and avoid being misled.
Simply buying an AI tool is insufficient for understanding its potential or deriving value. Leaders feeling behind in AI must actively participate in the deployment process—training the model, handling errors, and iterating daily. Passive ownership and delegation yield zero learning.
Gain influence by curating a backlog of valuable "side quest" projects that address team pain points. Proactively offering these well-defined opportunities to other engineers helps them meet their career goals and establishes you as a key network hub and leader.
It's nearly impossible to hire senior product or engineering leaders who are also fluent in AI. The advice for experienced managers is to step back into an Individual Contributor (IC) role. This allows them to build hands-on AI skills, demonstrating the humility and beginner's mindset necessary to lead in this new era.
To bypass subjective debates and gain influence, junior engineers can build prototypes for all competing technical approaches. By presenting concrete, comparative evidence after hours, they demonstrate immense value and can quickly establish themselves as technical authorities, accelerating their path to leadership.
While senior leaders are trained to delegate execution, AI is an exception. Direct, hands-on use is non-negotiable for leadership. It demystifies the technology, reveals its counterintuitive flaws, and builds the empathy required to understand team challenges. Leaders who remain hands-off will be unable to guide strategy effectively.
To stay current in a fast-moving field like AI, passive learning through articles and videos is insufficient. The key is active engagement: experimenting with new platforms, trying new features as they launch, and even building small applications to truly understand their capabilities and limitations.
To lead in the age of AI, it's not enough to use new tools; you must intentionally disrupt your own effective habits. Force yourself to build, write, and communicate in new ways to truly understand the paradigm shift, even when your old methods still work well.
A critical cultural lesson from Facebook is that all engineering leaders must remain hands-on. Seeing a VP fix bugs in bootcamp demonstrates that staying technical is essential for making credible, detail-driven strategic decisions and avoiding ivory-tower management.