Simply buying an AI tool is insufficient for understanding its potential or deriving value. Leaders feeling behind in AI must actively participate in the deployment process—training the model, handling errors, and iterating daily. Passive ownership and delegation yield zero learning.
Related Insights
For executives to truly drive AI adoption, simply using the tools isn't enough. They must model three key behaviors: publicly setting a clear vision for AI's role, actively participating in company-wide learning initiatives like hackathons, and empowering employees with the autonomy to experiment.
Business leaders often assume their teams are independently adopting AI. In reality, employees are hesitant to admit they don't know how to use it effectively and are waiting for formal training and a clear strategy. The responsibility falls on leadership to initiate AI education.
Webflow's CPO champions the "ICCPO" (Individual Contributor CPO) model. In the AI era, leaders must be hands-on practitioners who experiment with their own tools. This direct engagement is critical for understanding the new toolkit, discovering its limitations, and guiding their teams effectively from the trenches.
To prepare for a future of human-AI collaboration, technology adoption is not enough. Leaders must actively build AI fluency within their teams by personally engaging with the tools. This hands-on approach models curiosity and confidence, creating a culture where it's safe to experiment, learn, and even fail with new technology.
AI is a 'hands-on revolution,' not a technological shift like the cloud that can be delegated to an IT department. To lead effectively, executives (including non-technical ones) must personally use AI tools. This direct experience is essential for understanding AI's potential and guiding teams through transformation.
Product leaders must personally engage with AI development. Direct experience reveals unique, non-human failure modes. Unlike a human developer who learns from mistakes, an AI can cheerfully and repeatedly make the same error—a critical insight for managing AI projects and team workflow.
Simply instructing engineers to "build AI" is ineffective. Leaders must develop hands-on proficiency with no-code tools to understand AI's capabilities and limitations. This direct experience provides the necessary context to guide technical teams, make bolder decisions, and avoid being misled.
It's nearly impossible to hire senior product or engineering leaders who are also fluent in AI. The advice for experienced managers is to step back into an Individual Contributor (IC) role. This allows them to build hands-on AI skills, demonstrating the humility and beginner's mindset necessary to lead in this new era.
To successfully implement AI, approach it like onboarding a new team member, not just plugging in software. It requires initial setup, training on your specific processes, and ongoing feedback to improve its performance. This 'labor mindset' demystifies the technology and sets realistic expectations for achieving high efficacy.
Successful AI integration is a leadership priority, not a tech project. Leaders must "walk the talk" by personally using AI as a thought partner for their highest-value work, like reviewing financial statements or defining strategy. This hands-on approach is necessary to cast the vision and lead the cultural change required.