We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
After nearly 20 years of progress, the share of new female executives and board members at American companies has fallen. This "leaning out" is also reflected in women's self-reported ambition for promotions, which has stagnated while men's continues to rise, signaling a reversal of long-term trends.
Many women are already fulfilling a majority of the responsibilities for the role above them. The barrier to promotion is often not a lack of capability, but a lack of awareness and a strategy to articulate this value to leadership.
"Non-promotable tasks" (NPTs) are essential to an organization but do not lead to advancement. A study at a professional services firm found women perform 200 more hours of NPTs per year than men. This inequity equals an entire extra month of unrewarded work, hindering their career progression.
Research highlights a significant bias in promotion decisions. Men are often judged on their perceived capabilities two years in the future, allowing for deficits. In contrast, women are typically evaluated strictly against their current skill set, penalizing them for not already possessing every requirement of the role.
Many women believe that excelling at their job will automatically lead to advancement. However, promotion often goes to those who strategically position themselves and articulate their work's business impact, a skill separate from heads-down execution. The work doesn't always speak for itself.
Katie Nolan observes that after a period of progress for women in sports media, there's a palpable feeling that executives are reverting to old habits. She suggests the industry treated diversity as a box to be checked—'okay, we did that'—rather than a permanent cultural shift, and is now returning to a male-dominated default.
Career challenges faced by professional women are not random but fall into seven recurring patterns or "power gaps." These include not recognizing accomplishments, isolating from support, and acquiescing to mistreatment. Identifying which gaps are present allows for targeted, effective action.
Research shows women often have more mentors than men, but men have significantly more sponsors. Mentors offer advice, while sponsors use their influence to advocate and create opportunities. This distinction is critical for advancement, as sponsorship provides access to roles that mentorship alone cannot.
A senior female leader's primary concern about maternity leave was that her career progress would be lost, forcing a quick return. This reveals a deep-seated fear that having a family is a career penalty for women, a burden men don't typically face.
Harvard research shows women receive 44% more requests for non-promotable tasks (e.g., party planning) than men, keeping them in a "doer" role. To transition to a leadership identity, women must strategically decline work that offers no development opportunity to protect time for high-impact projects.
Standard corporate goal-setting and performance systems contain structural inequalities that penalize women. For example, women who network are seen as self-centered while men are rewarded. High-performing women also receive vastly more negative feedback (76%) than high-performing men (2%), hindering their advancement.