Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Humans subconsciously assign greater value to things perceived as requiring significant effort. This 'effort phenomenon' explains why a natural diamond is prized over an identical lab-grown one, and why low-effort, AI-generated content can feel irritating and valueless to consumers.

Related Insights

Customers often rate a service higher if they believe significant effort was expended—a concept called the "illusion of effort." Even if a faster, automated process yields the same result, framing the delivery around the effort invested in creating the system can boost perceived quality.

Using AI to save time on content can backfire if the audience expects authenticity. The value in human-created art, writing, or presentations often lies in the invested energy and personal story, which AI shortcuts can devalue in the customer's eyes.

Known as Input Bias, people value an output more if they perceive significant effort went into it. An 8-hour presentation is rated higher than an identical 18-minute one. Marketers should fight the urge to make everything seem instant and automated; sometimes, showing the "work" is more persuasive.

Consumers perceive products as higher quality when they are aware of the effort (e.g., number of prototypes, design iterations) that went into creating them. This 'labor illusion' works because people use effort as a mental shortcut to judge quality. Dyson's '5,127 prototypes' is a classic example.

Receiving a detailed, complimentary email is flattering until you realize it was AI-generated. The perceived value of the communication drops because the effort, a key component of the gesture, is missing. The thought is appreciated, but it's not the same as a personally crafted message.

Studies show people often prefer AI-generated art based on quality alone, but their preference flips to the human-created version once they know the source. This reveals a deep-seated bias for human effort, posing a significant "Catch-22" for marketers who risk losing audience appreciation if their AI usage is discovered.

Because AI can generate content in seconds, it is perceived as low-effort. This violates the "labor illusion," where effort signals quality. A study showed that when a poster was labeled "AI-powered" instead of "hand-drawn," purchase intent dropped by 61%. Brands using AI must reframe the narrative around the effort of building the system.

Consumers equate effort with quality and devalue work perceived as instant, like AI output. To combat this 'labor illusion,' stress the human expertise, years of research, or complex system development that enables the AI. Focus on the effort invested in the process, not just the speed of the result.

A psychological principle called the "effort heuristic" means we value things more when we believe a human worked hard on them. This will lead to a two-tiered economy: cheap, machine-made commodities and expensive, highly-valued artisanal services where human "handprints" are visible and celebrated.

This "labor illusion" taps into our heuristic that effort equals quality. Dyson constantly highlights James Dyson's 5,127 prototypes to signal the product's superiority. Similarly, artificially slowing down a travel search site and showing the "work" being done makes the results seem more comprehensive and valuable.

The 'Effort Phenomenon' Explains Why We Value Things That Seem Hard to Create | RiffOn