While stunts and "rage-bait" can generate massive initial attention for a product like Clulee, their impact diminishes over time. Once an audience has been enraged, it's harder to provoke the same reaction again, making it a powerful but unsustainable long-term growth strategy compared to consistent value proposition advertising.

Related Insights

Launching with a provocative stunt like Chad IDE's 'brain rot' editor can generate massive attention. However, this strategy backfires if there isn't a compelling, accessible core product to convert that attention into user adoption. Without a real product behind the curtain, a stunt remains just a stunt.

Paul Graham characterizes marketing strategies designed to intentionally anger people for attention as a tactic of "scammers." He argues that such approaches reveal a lack of long-term focus and earnest engineering, predicting that companies relying on these gimmicks will never become truly massive.

The power of reacting to a cultural moment lies in its perceived spontaneity. If a brand attempts this too often, consumers will see it as a calculated marketing ploy rather than a genuine response. The strategy must be reserved for select moments to remain effective.

Using rage bait as a core product feature, rather than just a marketing tactic, actively repels the potential investors, customers, and talent a startup needs. Successful VC-backed companies must build a supportive coalition, which this strategy fundamentally undermines.

Tushy's growth and brand teams collaborate to ensure ads drive performance without damaging long-term brand equity. They moved away from certain high-performing creative after asking if it created the right 'memory structure' for an increasingly premium product, prioritizing long-term perception over short-term wins.

Relying solely on short-term performance marketing becomes unsustainable. Brand investment acts as the fuel for these channels; cutting it means you must spend progressively more just to maintain the same results, leading to a negative spiral.

Contrary to the belief that ads quickly wear out, strong creative often performs better with repeated exposure. This concept of "wear in" justifies patience, allowing a new campaign to build familiarity and emotional connection with the audience, as stories grow resonance over time.

The IVF company Nucleus ran a subway campaign with provocative slogans like 'Have your best baby' to deliberately anger a segment of the population. This 'rage bait' strategy manufactures virality in controversial industries, leveraging negative reactions to gain widespread attention that would otherwise be difficult to achieve.

Familiarity breeds contentment, not contempt. The 'Mere Exposure Effect' shows that repeated exposure to a stimulus makes us feel more positive towards it. This explains why consistent campaigns outperform those that frequently change creative. The performance gap between effective, consistent campaigns and inconsistent ones widens dramatically over time, creating a compounding advantage.

Initial marketing efforts often fade as businesses get lazy or overwhelmed. Sustainable growth requires relentless consistency in content and engagement, not just one-off events like a ribbon-cutting. The mundane, daily discipline of marketing trumps short-lived, initial intensity.