A common red flag in AI PM interviews is when candidates, particularly those from a machine learning background, jump directly to technical solutions. They fail by neglecting core PM craft: defining the user ('the who'), the problem ('the why'), and the metrics for success, which must come before any discussion of algorithms.
Related Insights
Presented with the "LinkedIn for AI" problem, the designer's first step isn't visual design. It's product strategy: clarifying the core objective (e.g., matchmaking, certification), identifying the target user groups (job seekers, employers), and defining what "a good match" even means in this new context.
Don't evaluate your team's AI readiness as a standalone capability. True AI strategy requires a deep understanding of customer problems and unique value. Without strong core product competencies, AI adoption is merely tactical, not strategic.
Successful AI strategy development begins by asking executives about their primary business challenges, such as R&D costs or time-to-market. Only after identifying these core problems should AI solutions be mapped to them. This ensures AI initiatives are directly tied to tangible value creation.
In AI PM interviews, 'vibe coding' isn't a technical test. Interviewers evaluate your product thinking through how you structure prompts, the user insights you bring to iterations, and your ability to define feedback loops, not your ability to write code.
Because PMs deeply understand the customer's job, needs, and alternatives, they are the only ones qualified to write the evaluation criteria for what a successful AI output looks like. This critical task goes beyond technical metrics and is core to the PM's role in the AI era.
Without a strong foundation in customer problem definition, AI tools simply accelerate bad practices. Teams that habitually jump to solutions without a clear "why" will find themselves building rudderless products at an even faster pace. AI makes foundational product discipline more critical, not less.
Before any AI is built, deep workflow discovery is critical. This involves partnering with subject matter experts to map cross-functional processes, data flows, and user needs. AI currently cannot uncover these essential nuances on its own, making this human-centric step non-negotiable for success.
In the rush to adopt AI, teams are tempted to start with the technology and search for a problem. However, the most successful AI products still adhere to the fundamental principle of starting with user pain points, not the capabilities of the technology.
The key technical skill for an AI PM is not deep knowledge of model architecture but a higher-level understanding of how to orchestrate AI components. Knowing what AI can do and how systems connect is more valuable than knowing the specifics of fine-tuning or RAG implementation.
Technical implementation is becoming easier with AI. The critical, and now more valuable, skill is the ability to deeply understand customer needs, communicate effectively, and guide a product to market fit. The focus is shifting from "how to build it" to "what to build and why."
