Historically, authorities misidentify truly transformative ideas. The 16th-century Inquisition obsessively censored minor Protestant theological disputes while ignoring Machiavelli. Later, censors worried more about astrology in *Paradise Lost* than its revolutionary anti-monarchal rhetoric. Censors are poor predictors of which ideas will actually change the world.

The Reformation enabled the Enlightenment not because its doctrine was inherently progressive—early Protestantism was often fundamentalist—but because it broke the Catholic Church's intellectual monopoly. This fracture created a marketplace of ideas where different philosophies could compete, and forced societies to find ways to coexist with disagreement.

The printing press wasn't conceived for Bibles or intellectual enlightenment. It was a commercial hustle by Gutenberg to automate the production of "indulgences"—paid certificates from the Catholic Church promising salvation. The press solved a production bottleneck for a highly profitable product.

The Catholic Church financed the printing press to increase revenue, blind to its second-order effects. The same technology was later used by Martin Luther to mass-produce pamphlets that ignited the Protestant Reformation, undermining the church's authority.

The legal question of AI authorship has a historical parallel. Just as early photos were deemed copyrightable because of the photographer's judgment in composition and lighting, AI works can be copyrighted if a human provides detailed prompts, makes revisions, and exercises significant creative judgment. The AI is the tool, not the author.

Following the Galileo affair, the Inquisition felt a duty to verify scientific claims in books it was censoring. They established a laboratory to replicate experiments and test their truthfulness. This process of a second, independent body recreating results is the foundation of modern scientific peer review, ironically created by a body often seen as anti-science.

The Catholic Church banned Gutenberg's printing press for over 100 years, fearing the loss of control that widespread literacy would bring. Gutenberg himself died without seeing its impact. This historical precedent shows that powerful institutions have always resisted technologies that democratize information and power.

Major innovations are often driven by simple greed, not lofty ideals. Gutenberg, a "grifter" obsessed with getting rich, secured his initial funding from the Catholic Church to mass-produce "letters of indulgence"—effectively selling tickets to heaven.

The printing press, a technology financed by the Catholic Church to solidify its power, was weaponized by Martin Luther to dismantle that same power. By printing pamphlets with bullet-pointed arguments, he bypassed the establishment's information monopoly, acting as the first mass-media disruptor.