Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

History from the 1970s shows that when governments impose local price caps on oil, it backfires by creating artificial shortages and gas lines. Producers will simply sell their oil on the global market for a higher price, starving the price-controlled region of supply. This policy mistake is likely to be repeated.

Related Insights

Oil is a global commodity, so prices are set internationally. Even if a nation is energy independent, a supply disruption anywhere will cause global buyers to bid up prices everywhere. Domestic producers will then either export or match the higher international price, raising costs at home.

Despite the US being energy independent, the price of oil is determined globally. A crisis in the Strait of Hormuz will raise prices for everyone, including Americans at the pump, as international buyers bid up the price of all available oil, including US-produced crude.

Artificially suppressing oil prices or keeping them in a manipulated range prevents producers from investing in new production, evidenced by flat rig counts. This lack of a supply response ensures the underlying scarcity problem worsens, leading to structurally higher prices over time.

In a severe supply shock, demand destruction isn't about wealthy consumers driving less. Instead, lower-income countries are priced out of the market entirely, unable to attract scarce barrels. This transforms a price problem for developed nations into an outright physical shortage for developing ones.

Releasing emergency oil stockpiles, intended to calm markets, can have the opposite effect. It may signal to traders that officials expect a prolonged disruption, leading to panic buying and higher prices, as was seen in 2022. This highlights the powerful psychological component of market reactions.

A country's ability to produce its own oil doesn't protect its consumers from price hikes. When a major global supply is disrupted, other nations bid up the price on the international market, forcing domestic producers to match it and causing prices to rise everywhere.

The primary economic risk from an energy crisis is not just high prices, which dampen activity. A more severe threat is a "volume shock"—physical shortages and supply chain disruptions that can completely stop economic activity, affecting manufacturing inputs beyond just fuel.

In markets with government-set fuel prices, refiners are forced to operate at negative margins during supply shocks. They absorb massive losses to avoid politically unpopular shutdowns and high restart costs, creating desperate, price-insensitive demand for immediate oil cargoes.

Despite his stated goal of lowering oil prices, President Trump's aggressive sanctions on Venezuela, Iran, and Russia have removed significant supply from the market. This creates logistical bottlenecks and "oil on water" buildups, effectively tightening the market and keeping prices higher than they would be otherwise.

While banning US oil exports would initially crash domestic prices, it would quickly cause an overflow of products like diesel in the Gulf Coast. Refineries would then be forced to cut production, ultimately creating shortages of other fuels like gasoline on the East Coast and disrupting the entire system.