Ben Thompson argues that Google's perceived weakness—its suboptimal execution and unfocused projects—is actually a source of strength. This "fluff," funded by its massive core business, creates adaptability and resilience. While slow, Google acts like a slime mold that eventually engulfs more optimized but brittle competitors.
Related Insights
The founders initially feared their data collection hardware would be easily copied. However, they discovered the true challenge and defensible moat lay in scaling the full-stack system—integrating hardware iterations, data pipelines, and training loops. The unexpected difficulty of this process created a powerful competitive advantage.
Google's competitive actions hurting Firefox were consistently framed as unintentional mistakes. This subtle tactic, described as the "year of 100 oopses," allowed them to gain market share while maintaining plausible deniability, illustrating an effective but indirect competitive strategy.
Google's mission to 'organize the world's information' creates a natural, logical pathway to diverse products like Maps and Waymo. In contrast, Meta's mission to 'bring people together' makes its leaps into less-connected fields like VR or generative AI feel more forced and less authentic.
According to Cloudflare's network data, Google's enduring AI advantage comes from its data moat. Its web crawlers access 3.2 times more web pages than OpenAI's, providing a vastly larger training dataset that competitors struggle to match, potentially securing Google's long-term lead.
Unlike competitors who specialize, Google is the only company operating at scale across all four key layers of the AI stack. It has custom silicon (TPUs), a major cloud platform (GCP), a frontier foundational model (Gemini), and massive application distribution (Search, YouTube). This vertical integration is a unique strategic advantage in the AI race.
Google can dedicate nearly all its resources to AI product development because its core business handles infrastructure and funding. In contrast, OpenAI must constantly focus on fundraising and infrastructure build-out. This mirrors the dynamic where a focused Facebook outmaneuvered a distracted MySpace, highlighting a critical incumbent advantage.
Initially, AI chatbots were seen as a threat to Google's search dominance. Instead, Google leveraged its existing ecosystem (Chrome, Android) and distribution power to make its AI, Gemini, the default on major platforms, turning a potential disruptor into another layer of its fortress.
As the market leader, OpenAI has become risk-averse to avoid media backlash. This has “damaged the product,” making it overly cautious and less useful. Meanwhile, challengers like Google have adopted a risk-taking posture, allowing them to innovate faster. This shows how a defensive mindset can cede ground to hungrier competitors.
While OpenAI leads in AI buzz, Google's true advantage is its established ecosystem of Chrome, Search, Android, and Cloud. Newcomers like OpenAI aspire to build this integrated powerhouse, but Google already is one, making its business far more resilient even if its own AI stumbles.
While startups like OpenAI can lead with a superior model, incumbents like Google and Meta possess the ultimate moat: distribution to billions of users across multiple top-ranked apps. They can rapidly deploy "good enough" models through established channels to reclaim market share from first-movers.
