A single contact qualifying out an offer does not mean the entire account is a dead end. In B2B deals with large buying groups, other stakeholders may have different needs. Marketing must continue to monitor the account for other buying signals.

Related Insights

Contrary to the 'always be closing' mindset, the goal of early-stage qualification should be disqualification. Advancing deals based on mere 'interest' rather than true 'intent' leads to bloated pipelines and low win rates. Getting to 'no' quickly is more efficient than chasing unqualified leads.

CloudPay stopped using the word "lead" and adopted "signal" instead. This semantic shift prevents sales reps from chasing a single junior contact and encourages them to research and target the entire buying committee (CFO, CHRO) at the interested account.

Two clear red flags indicate a deal is at risk: relying on a single contact and having a close date not tied to a specific buyer deadline. To de-risk a deal, sales reps must engage multiple stakeholders (multi-threading) and anchor the timeline to the buyer's critical business needs.

In B2B sales with multiple decision-makers, tracking individual MQLs is a "lazy metric" that misrepresents buying intent. Success depends on identifying and engaging the entire buying group. Marketing's goal should be to qualify the group, not just a single lead.

With 50% of opportunities lacking associated contacts, marketing was flying blind. For a high ACV business with long sales cycles, this is a critical failure. It prevents understanding the buying committee, multi-threading, and nurturing different personas, rendering marketing ineffective during active deals.

The traditional MQL model, focused on individuals, can be dangerously misleading. A real-world example showed 27 MQLs from one account were rejected by sales, completely hiding the immense collective buying intent of a large committee. This highlights the need for an account-centric view.

Prospects often express interest to gather information but lack a commitment to solve the problem. Sellers must differentiate by probing for concrete timelines and stakeholder involvement to avoid chasing deals that won't close, rather than hoping to convert interest into commitment on the call.

Instead of treating a "no" as a dead end, design your sales process to automatically move the prospect to the next monetization opportunity, even if it's a different offer. This provides another chance to provide value and capture revenue, maximizing yield per lead.

The buying committee is larger than just the key contacts sales engages. Hidden influencers, particularly in procurement, play a crucial role. If they have no brand awareness or trust in your company when the deal reaches their desk for final approval, they can single-handedly block it.

Reframe the objective of a sales meeting to be getting a 'no' as quickly as possible. A 'yes' is simply a byproduct of failing to get a 'no.' This counterintuitive approach helps identify non-decision-makers instantly and forces qualified buyers to justify why the conversation should continue.

Salespeople Prematurely Disqualify Accounts by Mistaking One Contact's 'No' for a Group Decision | RiffOn