Get your free personalized podcast brief
We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Unlike European waterfalls that pay carry only after all capital is returned, an American waterfall allows for deal-by-deal carry distribution. This creates a significant risk for junior employees who might receive a large payout early in a fund's life, only to have it "clawed back" years later if the fund ultimately underperforms its hurdle rate. They may have to repay money they've already spent and paid taxes on.
Related Insights
The terms within your Limited Partner Agreement (LPA), like using an American vs. European waterfall or a budget-based fee vs. 2-and-20, are not just financial details. They are a powerful, immediate signal to LPs about whether your new firm is GP-friendly or LP-friendly, setting the tone for negotiations.
Unlike other models, a traditional PE fund has a fixed period (usually five years) to invest its capital. This creates a "pressure to deploy" that can lead to strategy drift. If a manager cannot find deals in their stated niche, they may be tempted to make bad investments just to avoid returning capital.
VC funds between $50M and a few hundred million can be a 'dead zone' for general partners. They are too large to benefit from the quick-carry potential of small funds but too small to generate significant management fees like mega-funds, making the personal economics challenging for managers.
While the deal-by-deal carry of an independent sponsor is attractive, the risk is concentrated. A single failed deal is a public zero. Unlike a traditional fund where winners offset losers in a portfolio, a fundless sponsor's bad deal directly damages their track record and ability to raise future capital.
The unprecedented 3-4 year drought in private equity liquidity has fundamentally broken traditional Limited Partner models. LPs, who historically planned on a 4-year cash flow cycle for receiving distributions, are now facing an 8-9 year cycle, creating immense pressure on their allocation and return models.
A significant, yet uncommon, sign of an LP-friendly VC is returning a portion of the carry from Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) to the original fund's LPs. This acknowledges that the main fund's resources and reputation sourced the follow-on investment opportunity in the first place.
Despite perceptions of quick wealth, venture capital is a long-term game. Investors can face periods of 10 years or more without receiving any cash distributions (carry) from their funds. This illiquidity and delayed gratification stand in stark contrast to the more immediate payouts seen in public markets or big tech compensation.
TA's compensation structure aligns partner incentives directly with investor returns. The primary way for partners to increase their ownership (carry) is by generating realized gains—i.e., returning capital to Limited Partners. This systemically prioritizes liquidity and successful exits over simply deploying capital or marking up portfolio value on paper.
The legendary investor calls venture capital's business model a "scam" because VCs get paid management fees regardless of performance. He argues this structure incentivizes deploying capital even on overly risky bets, as the manager's personal downside is limited while their upside is significant.
A 'zombie fund' is a fund that is unlikely to raise subsequent capital due to poor performance. The General Partner's incentive shifts from generating returns to simply holding onto remaining assets. This allows them to continue collecting management fees on invested capital and delay a final reckoning that might trigger a clawback of previously paid carry.