Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Snap spins off ventures like Specs (AR) to protect their startup-like nature. A mature, billion-user platform requires different operational thinking and investment strategies than a net-new product. This separation allows each entity to operate with the appropriate model for its stage.

Related Insights

Snap fosters innovation by maintaining two distinct structures: a small, flat design team for new ideas and a large, hierarchical organization for scaled execution. Leadership's key role is to manage the dialogue and mutual respect between these two groups, preventing the natural friction that arises.

Booz Allen spun out its internal Snap Attack technology because they determined it required a venture capital investment profile to scale rapidly. They recognized that an external VC-backed structure was better suited for its growth trajectory than their internal corporate environment.

The same AR glasses technology would earn a startup a billion-dollar valuation. For Snap, which has already spent $3.5B on R&D, the product is viewed negatively by the market because it's judged against the performance of its core ads business, not as a standalone innovation.

Rivian created ALSO as a spin-out to attack the micromobility market, allowing the new company to adopt a more suitable contract manufacturing model instead of Rivian's capital-intensive, vertically-integrated car factories. This "sibling company" approach enables targeted strategies for different vehicle classes while sharing technology.

Large companies like Rippling and TripActions maintain innovation velocity by creating "carved out" teams for new, "zero to one" initiatives. This organizational strategy provides singular focus, empowering a small group to execute with the intensity and speed of an early-stage startup without corporate distractions.

To innovate at scale, Harness treats each new product as a semi-independent entity. These "startups" have a founder-like PM, go through internal seed/Series A funding stages tied to revenue milestones (e.g., $1M ARR), and are responsible for their own initial founder-led sales.

Vercel created a separate business unit for its AI tool, V0, because it targets a different audience (PMs, designers) and needed to operate with extreme speed, unburdened by the decision-making processes of the larger 700-person parent company.

When a collaborative venture grows exponentially faster than the original brands, it's a signal to create a standalone identity. This avoids customer confusion and allows the new entity to build its own brand equity unencumbered by its origins.

By creating a separate company, Spex Inc., for its AR glasses, Snap can attract external, high-risk capital specifically for that venture. This financial structure, also used by Alphabet for Waymo, allows a public company to fund ambitious projects without diluting the core business.

Snap's core social media business remains a valuable, scaled asset with nearly half a billion daily users. However, it's burdened by money-losing hardware ventures like Spex. This makes the company a perfect target for an activist investor who could force a spin-off or shutdown of the hardware division to unlock the core business's value.

Snap Spins Off Ventures to Isolate Them From Its Mature Platform's Processes | RiffOn