Julian Robertson's "story-based" investing wasn't about speculative narratives. It was a framework to ensure an investment thesis, like the supply-demand dynamics of copper, was logical and easily understood. If the core logic changed, the investment itself had to change.

WCM realized their portfolio became too correlated because their research pipeline itself was the root cause, with analysts naturally chasing what was working. To fix this, they built custom company categorization tools to force diversification at the idea generation stage, ensuring a broader set of opportunities is always available.

Beyond standard sentiment indicators, Julian Robertson evaluated the source of market capital. He distinguished between speculative "dumb money," which couldn't sustain a bull run, and institutional "smart money" from sources like pensions, using this flow analysis as a sophisticated gauge of market health.

When entering the unfamiliar small-cap space, Julian Robertson tapped his own investor base for ideas. This unconventional approach turned Limited Partners into a valuable, proprietary deal flow network, demonstrating a creative way to leverage existing relationships for new opportunities.

Robertson's global research served as a competitive analysis tool for his domestic investments. By studying German pharma companies like Smith, Klein, Beecham, he gained a deeper understanding of the competitive landscape for American giants like Merck, sharpening his thesis on U.S. holdings.

Temasek's partnership philosophy is not about risk diversification. Instead, it prioritizes collaborating with partners who can augment its internal capabilities and provide specific skill sets it lacks for a given opportunity. This makes partnership a strategic tool for capability building, not just capital sharing.

Robertson managed the Tiger Fund with a centralized, "queen bee" decision-making style. This approach, successful at a smaller scale, became a critical failure point as assets grew past $20 billion, highlighting the necessity of evolving leadership and delegating responsibility during rapid growth.

The high-velocity investment model pioneered by Tiger Global didn't disappear. Instead, its core strategy—prioritizing capital velocity over returns—was adopted by 6-8 other major firms. The venture landscape has bifurcated, with many top-tier brands moving toward this model, leaving a void in the craft-focused, high-touch space.

Rather than passively holding, Julian Robertson directly engaged with the management of his portfolio companies, such as Ford. He wrote letters challenging their capital allocation decisions, advocating for share buybacks over low-return acquisitions to unlock shareholder value.