Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The goal isn't to be universally liked. In the new media landscape, if you don't have people who strongly disagree with you, you're likely not being interesting enough to capture attention. A polarizing brand with passionate fans and vocal critics is far more powerful and visible than one that evokes a lukewarm, neutral response.

Related Insights

Host Jay Schwedelson argues that negative feedback is an unavoidable and even necessary byproduct of creating content that people love. If you aren't turning some people off, you likely aren't creating something compelling enough to attract passionate fans. Don't let the fear of "haters" dilute your message.

Being truly authentic means you will not appeal to everyone. A strong personal brand will elicit powerful, polarized reactions. If your feedback is consistently neutral or lukewarm, you are likely not being authentic enough and are trying to appease the masses.

Building a strong brand requires more than defining what you stand for; it requires clarifying what you stand against. This creates a sharp identity that resonates deeply with a core audience, even if it alienates others. Trying to be a brand for everybody results in a brand for nobody.

Haters generate more conversation than fans, which boosts visibility in algorithms. People may forget the negative sentiment, but they remember the name. For public figures, haters are a key part of the marketing math, as all engagement contributes to reach and talk value.

Receiving negative or controversial feedback on social media indicates your work is opinionated and differentiated enough to provoke a reaction. Rather than a failure, this is a sign of market impact and having a distinct point of view.

A leader trying to be all things to all people will have a diluted, unactivating message. Building a powerful movement requires a strong narrative with heroes and villains, which inevitably polarizes audiences. Eliciting disdain from outsiders is a necessary byproduct of energizing a core base.

The primary rule of old media was to be as uninteresting as possible to avoid controversy. This defensive posture is now a liability. In the noisy landscape of new media, the only way to gain traction is to be interesting, which requires an offensive mindset and a willingness to have a strong, sometimes polarizing, point of view.

In a market saturated with "we're for everyone" messaging, brands must adopt a more exclusive and provocative stance to stand out. True brand love requires polarity; if nobody dislikes your brand, it's unlikely anyone truly loves it.

A brand that tries to please everyone is memorable to no one. To build a truly strong brand, you must be willing to be disliked by some. Intentionally defining who your customer is *not* and creating polarizing content sharpens your identity, fostering a passionate community among those who love what you stand for.

The old goal of being universally liked is incompatible with being powerful in the new media environment. If you are making an impact and have a strong point of view, some people will inevitably dislike you. This controversy should be viewed as a positive signal of your relevance and significance, not a problem to be solved.

In New Media, Neutrality Is Invisibility; Successful Brands Attract Both Fans and Haters | RiffOn