We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Host Jay Schwedelson argues that negative feedback is an unavoidable and even necessary byproduct of creating content that people love. If you aren't turning some people off, you likely aren't creating something compelling enough to attract passionate fans. Don't let the fear of "haters" dilute your message.
For any creative work shared publicly, you will receive diametrically opposed feedback. One person will love a feature that another hates. Realizing that all feedback is subjective and contradictory frees you from the futile search for external validation and allows you to focus on your own vision.
If you aren't receiving regular pushback, it's a sign you're not saying anything meaningful or challenging the status quo. Instead of viewing criticism as a negative outcome to be avoided, see its absence as a red flag that your content is too safe and therefore lacks real impact.
To avoid becoming a caricature of your most extreme views, periodically release content that is unapologetically you, even if it splits your audience. This purges "fair-weather fans" and reinforces your true identity, preventing you from being shaped by your audience's expectations.
Fear of negative feedback prevents many professionals from posting content. Reframe this fear by understanding the psychology of trolls. People who leave hateful comments are often in pain themselves, and lashing out is their way of seeking temporary relief. Their comments are a reflection of them, not you.
Being truly authentic means you will not appeal to everyone. A strong personal brand will elicit powerful, polarized reactions. If your feedback is consistently neutral or lukewarm, you are likely not being authentic enough and are trying to appease the masses.
A leader trying to be all things to all people will have a diluted, unactivating message. Building a powerful movement requires a strong narrative with heroes and villains, which inevitably polarizes audiences. Eliciting disdain from outsiders is a necessary byproduct of energizing a core base.
Don't be deterred by criticism from industry peers. Zaria Parvez of Duolingo views it as a positive indicator. If marketers dislike your work but consumers love it, you're successfully breaking through the marketing echo chamber and connecting with your actual audience.
Jack Conte advises that trying to appeal to everyone results in appealing to no one. Founders and creators who are fearlessly themselves, even if it polarizes some, build the most rabidly loyal communities because they sound like real, relatable people.
A brand that tries to please everyone is memorable to no one. To build a truly strong brand, you must be willing to be disliked by some. Intentionally defining who your customer is *not* and creating polarizing content sharpens your identity, fostering a passionate community among those who love what you stand for.
The old goal of being universally liked is incompatible with being powerful in the new media environment. If you are making an impact and have a strong point of view, some people will inevitably dislike you. This controversy should be viewed as a positive signal of your relevance and significance, not a problem to be solved.